Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor Deprescription on the Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Quasi-Interventional Substudy of MedSafer
Prosty, C.; Pilon, Y.; Lee, J. J.; Lee, T. C.; McDonald, E.
Show abstract
Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been proposed as a risk factor for initial and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) based on observational data. Whether desprescribing PPIs reduces the odds of incident CDI is unknown. Methods This was a secondary analysis of the cluster randomized MedSafer clinical trial dataset, in which hospitalized older adults taking five or more medications were randomized to usual care (a medication review) or electronic deprescribing decision support prior to hospital discharge. For this substudy, all patients were included regardless of trial assignment and were categorized according to their PPI use at hospitalization and discharge. The 30-day occurrence of CDI was compared as a function of PPI use using a Bayesian mixed-effect logistic regression adjusted for prespecified confounders. Results 4990 patients were included in the analysis, including 405 (8.1%) patients who were deprescribed their home PPI and 325 (6.5%) new PPI users. 30-day CDI occurred in 32 (0.6%) patients. PPI deprescription was associated with a 99.1% probability of increased odds of CDI (adjusted odds ratio[aOR]=3.66, 95%Credible interval[95%CrI]=1.25-10.11). New PPI use, however, was not associated with a probable increase in CDI (aOR=1.14, 95%CrI=0.20-4.67). Conclusion Unexpectedly, PPI deprescription was associated with a higher odds of CDI. This challenges the practice of deprescribing unnecessary PPIs in hospitalized patients for CDI prevention. However, it is possible this finding is artefactual due to confounding by indication. Further mechanistic and confirmatory studies are needed.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Famotidine Use is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Retrospective Cohort Study 92%
- Efficacy and Safety of Tradipitant in Diabetic and Idiopathic Gastroparesis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. 90%
- Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease and Cirrhosis: a N3C Study 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibiotics and hospital-associated Clostridioides difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis 2020 update 92%
- Trends in fluoroquinolone prescribing in UK primary and secondary care between 2019 and 2023 90%
- Mortality risks associated with empirical antibiotic activity in E. coli bacteraemia: an analysis of electronic health records 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- People exposed to proton pump inhibitors shortly preceding COVID-19 diagnosis are not at an increased risk of subsequent hospitalizations and mortality: a nation-wide matched cohort study 94%
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 92%
- Preclinical Efficacy in Investigator’s Brochures: Stakeholders’ views on measures to improve Completeness and Robustness 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Appropriate management of steroids and discharge planning during and after hospital admission for moderate-severe ulcerative colitis 90%
- Prune intake ameliorates chronic constipation symptoms and causes little discomfort from diarrhea and loose stools: A randomized placebo-controlled trial 90%
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients Presumed to be Treated with Sotrovimab in NHS Hospitals in England 89%
- Risk factor modelling of antimicrobial resistance in cancer patients: A systematic review 89%
- 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose as an Adjunct to Standard of Care in the Medical Management of COVID-19: A Proof-of-Concept & Dose-Ranging Randomised Clinical Trial 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.