Preference for Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Black Community
Li, R.; Jackson, T. M.; Onyekaba, J.; He, Y.; Njoku, K.; Amadi, C.; Chandora, A.; Santori, D. O.; Gundroo, H.; Tobun, T.; Smith, C.; Hommes, D.; Luevano, J.; Liu, J.
Show abstract
Background: Blood-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a novel, less invasive screening that has the potential to improve CRC screening adherence, particularly among Black American populations, which has historically lower screening rates. We evaluated factors associated with preference for blood-based CRC screening among Black adults in church-based community settings. Methods: From October 2023 to January 2024, a cross-sectional survey was conducted over 101 adults aged 45 to 75 years at three Black churches in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia. Demographics, CRC screening history, healthcare access, and attitudes toward blood-based CRC screening were assessed. Results: Overall, 72 participants (71.3%) preferred blood-based CRC screening. Preference was not associated with demographic or socioeconomic characteristics, screening history, or healthcare access. The most commonly reported reasons for ease of testing (83.3%), avoidance of stool collection (38.9%), avoidance of bowel preparation (36.1%), perceived fewer side effects (34.7%), and perceived lower risk (33.3%). Needle concerns were the only factor significantly associated with non-preference (p=0.034). Conclusion: Blood-based colorectal cancer screening was preferred by most Black adults and may improve CRC screening participation through greater convenience.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Colorectal cancer screening based on predicted risk: a pilot randomized controlled trial 92%
- Prune intake ameliorates chronic constipation symptoms and causes little discomfort from diarrhea and loose stools: A randomized placebo-controlled trial 91%
- Non-endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in at risk Veterans 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- US women screen at lower rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer 92%
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening and Treatment in Older Adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study 92%
- Cancer risk perception and knowledge and physician communication behaviors: specific influences on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening in women 50-65 years old 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 91%
- “One more tool in the tool belt”: A qualitative interview study investigating patient and clinician opinions on the integration of psychometrics into routine testing for disorders of gut-brain interaction 90%
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal study of blood microbiome responses to milk reintroduction in healthy volunteers: A prospective, single-arm crossover study protocol 86%
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 84%
- Power calculations for detecting differences in efficacy of fecal microbiota donors 84%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.