Back

Age-dependent Structural Reorganization of the Human Plasma Proteome

Ji, J.; Kim, Y.; Han, E.; Choi, Y.; Park, J.; Lee, H.; Park, S.; Son, A.; Kim, H.

2026-07-20 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.07.19.739388 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aging is characterized by progressive physiological decline, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying these changes remain incompletely understood. Although extensive work has examined age-related alterations in protein abundance, the age-dependent structural reorganization of proteins and their interaction networks remains largely unexplored. Here, we quantitatively characterize the structural dynamics of plasma proteins across healthy adult aging and identify age-dependent accessibility patterns that may serve as candidate structural biomarkers. We employed Covalent Protein Painting (CPP) coupled with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-based LC-MS/MS to analyze plasma from 24 healthy individuals spanning four age groups (20s to 50s, n = 6 per group). Lysine surface accessibility changes were analyzed using cosine similarity trajectory matching and limma-based linear modeling. The intersection of the two approaches defined five reproducible age-dependent trajectories encompassing 27 proteins and 57 peptides. Integrating STRING/Cytoscape network analysis with AlphaFold3 multimer complex prediction localized several CPP-detected peptides to within [~]5 [A] of predicted protein-protein interaction interfaces (KNG1, C3; REN, ALB; and ALB, FGB), suggesting that age-associated accessibility changes are organized at interaction interfaces rather than occurring as isolated local events. Our findings indicate that the human plasma proteome undergoes coordinated, network-level changes in structural accessibility during adult aging, providing a framework for structure-based biomarker discovery. Because CPP signal reflects both conformational accessibility and protein abundance, and because the cohort is modest and cross-sectional, the trajectories reported here are framed as hypothesis-generating and are interpreted with these constraints made explicit throughout.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.