Back

Discordant associations of IGF-binding proteins 1 & 2 with diabetes and cardiovascular disease: insights from UK Biobank

Rolfe-Hammerton, E. R.; Conning-Rowland, M. S.; De Faveri, L. E.; Simmons, K. J.; Meakin, P. J.; Cubbon, R. M.; Wheatcroft, S. B.

2026-07-20 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.07.17.26358347 medRxiv
Show abstract

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) axis has been implicated in diabetes mellitus and the associated burden of cardiovascular complications. Higher circulating levels of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 have been established as markers of protection from incident type 2 diabetes, yet their associations with cardiovascular disease remain unclear. Utilising the UK Biobank (UKB) resource to integrate disease outcomes, plasma proteomics and MRI data, we examined associations of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 with incident diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Approximately 50,000 UKB participants with plasma proteomic measurements for IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 were included. Multivariate Cox regression models revealed that participants in the highest quartiles of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 had a substantially lower risk of incident diabetes (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.31 and 0.32 respectively), but, paradoxically, had increased risks of incident macrovascular disease, all-cause and cardiovascular-related mortality (HR = 1.81 and 2.39). Both proteins were negatively associated with HbA1c levels, triglyceride/HDL ratio and abdominal adiposity, yet positively associated with NT-proBNP, troponin I, cardiac chamber size and aortic dimensions. In summary, negative associations of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 with incident diabetes mellitus did not translate to a reduced cardiovascular risk, suggesting potentially complex actions of IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 in the pathophysiology of cardiometabolic disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.