Back

Construction of a risk prediction model for postoperative bleeding in patients with thyroid cancer based on clinical data

zhang, y.; chen, w.; li, x.; shen, w.

2026-07-18 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.16.26358297 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective To develop and validate a risk model for predicting postoperative bleeding in patients with thyroid cancer. Methods A total of 2800 consecutive patients diagnosed with thyroid cancer in the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on postoperative bleeding occurrence: bleeding and non-bleeding groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to screen independent risk factors. Meanwhile, risk prediction models were developed and nomogram . Subgroup analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. The predictive effects of the models were assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Of the 2800 recruited patients, 50 had postoperative bleeding, with an incidence rate of 1.7%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, hypertension, total thyroidectomy, tumor size [&ge;]4 cm, and operation time [&ge;]90 min were the risk factors for postoperative bleeding in thyroid cancer patients (P<0.05). A risk prediction model was established based on the above factors, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.881, with a sensitivity of 94.0%, a specificity of 67.3%, and an accuracy of 74.0%. Decision curve analysis revealed that the model had good predictive ability. Conclusions The constructed risk prediction model has good predictive power and can provide a reference for healthcare professionals to predict the risk of bleeding in patients after thyroid cancer surgery.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
27.9%
2
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.6%
4
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.6%
6
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
7
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
11
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Molecular Biology Reports
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
15
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
16
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
18
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
19
Gene Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
20
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Genes to Cells
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
25
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
29
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
30
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%