Initial Technical and Clinical Validation of Mobile Pupillometry with Virtual Reality: A Digital Biomarker for Screening Cognitive Function and Impairment
Brendler, A.; Fietz, J.; Bauer, A.; Pfahl, D.; Higgins, S.; Vidovic, E.; Brueckl, T.; BeCOME Working Group, ; Memory Clinic Working Group, ; Hupe, K.; Knop, M.; Spoormaker, V. I.
Show abstract
Cognitive impairment is a prevalent symptom extending from physiological ageing to disease. It commonly manifests itself in initial memory problems, progressing and co-occurring in more severe conditions such as Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease and Major Depressive Disorder. However, current non-invasive screening assessments either lack biological information or are invasive and restricted to specialized centers with complex and cost-intensive set-ups. Here, we conducted an initial validation of mobile pupillometry with Virtual Reality (VR) under experimental conditions as a digital biomarker for cognitive impairment by testing required biomarker-specific properties. For this purpose, we first assessed its construct validity by testing healthy participants (n=43) on an n-back task in VR while pupil size was measured. Mixed effects models revealed that similar to lab-based eye-tracking systems, pupil size increased in a sensible and distinguishable fashion as a function of working memory load. Second, to test the signal's reliability, the same participants were tested on the identical set-up two to three months after their first visit. We observed that the pupil response profile was highly stable over this period. Third, for its clinical validity, we examined patients (n=89) from three different cohorts with varying degrees of cognitive impairment and compared them to healthy control participants (n=81). Mixed-effects models indicated that pupil size was reduced as a function of cognitive impairment levels at higher cognitive load and that this effect was stronger pronounced with increasing age. In conclusion, we provide initial evidence for mobile pupillometry being a sensitive, reliable and clinically valid digital biomarker for cognitive functioning and impairment, which offers desirable properties due to its quick, automatized and location-independent set-up. Keywords: digital biomarker, mobile pupillometry, Virtual Reality, cognition, , Major Depressive Disorder, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond Traditional Assessments of Cognitive Impairment: Exploring the Potential of Spatial Navigation Tasks 93%
- Mobile version of the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities (BAASTA): Implementation and adult norms 91%
- Methods in Cognitive Pupillometry: Design, Preprocessing, and Statistical Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between task-related aperiodic EEG activity, neural inefficiency and verbal working memory in younger and older adults 93%
- Visual short-term memory related EEG components in a virtual reality setup 93%
- Detecting impaired language processing in MCI patients using around-the-ear cEEgrid electrodes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Remote Digital Memory Composite to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Memory Clinic Samples in Unsupervised Settings using Mobile Devices 94%
- Smartphone-Based Symbol-Digit Modalities Test Reliably Measures Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients 91%
- Interpretable deep learning approach for extracting cognitive features from hand-drawn images of intersecting pentagons in older adults 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developmental changes in individual alpha frequency: Recording EEG data during public engagement events 94%
- Pre-stimulus Activity Mediates Event-Related Theta Synchronization and Alpha Desynchronization During Memory Formation in Healthy Aging 92%
- Contextual Expectations in the Real-World Modulate Low-Frequency Neural Oscillations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.