Back

The Prognostic Value of Genetic Architectures in Cognitive Decline

Espero, M.

2026-07-15 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.13.26357971 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background & Methods: The multifaceted physical nature of heritable cognitive impairment in dementia presents significant challenges for traditional linear frameworks attempting to model synergistic risk. While various loci are identified as contributing to neurocognitive disparities, the emergent phenotypic expression and associated predictive value relative to standard clinical baselines require further investigation. To facilitate dimensional reduction of complex genetic data into identifiable phenotypes, Generalized Low Rank Modeling (GLRM) and K-means clustering are applied to participant data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). The utility of these derived archetypes and clusters is assessed, stratifying variance for Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) performance. Utilizing generalized additive modeling (GAM) and partial eta squared (p2) effect size, the derived genetic features are compared with other predictors including age, educational attainment, gender, and raw, genetic variant carriage dimensions. Results & Conclusion: In accordance with the hypothesized empirical regularity, age and education persist as primary predictors of MMSE performance. The unsupervised machine learning pipeline successfully identified a composite genetic cluster that emerged as an influential predictor in terms of relative magnitude (p2). Centroid analysis of the GLRM subspace indicated that a particular sub-population (Cluster 2) - defined by a substantial weighting on the EPHA1 target - demonstrated a statistically significant association with MMSE scores, relative to cluster 3. These results suggest that data-driven genetic feature engineering provides an interpretable basis for inference regarding variance in global cognition. By discovering multivariate genetic architecture, this modeling approach captures complexity often missed by individual clinical variable modeling. Such findings implicate the utility of interpretable machine learning for translational dementia research and predictive clinical stratification.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
3
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.8%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
13
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
20
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%