Pre-Operative Single 150 Mg Dose of Pregabalin for Postoperative Pain Management in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Dewasi, G.; Nagda, P.; Jain, S.
Show abstract
Effective postoperative pain control is essential following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, yet the analgesic value of a standardised 150 mg preoperative dose of pregabalin has not been clearly established. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised evidence from seven randomised controlled trials published between 2008 and 2025 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin when administered before surgery. Four trials reported 24-hour postoperative pain scores, and pooled analysis demonstrated that pregabalin significantly reduced pain compared with control (SMD = 0.80 lower; 95% CI, 1.42 to 0.18 lower; p = 0.01), although statistical heterogeneity was high (I-squared = 81%). Pregabalin also produced notable reductions in opioid consumption, including fentanyl (SMD = 1.24 lower; p = 0.002) and tramadol (SMD = 4.21 lower; p = 0.002), again with considerable variability across studies. Sedation was slightly increased but did not reach statistical significance, and there were no significant differences in postoperative nausea, vomiting, or headache. Sensitivity analyses supported the stability of these findings. Overall, the results indicate that a single 150 mg preoperative dose of pregabalin meaningfully reduces postoperative pain and opioid requirements following laparoscopic cholecystectomy while maintaining an acceptable safety profile, supporting its use as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone improves analgesia in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 95%
- The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate combined with propofol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial 95%
- Interventions to reduce opioid use for patients with chronic non-cancer pain in primary care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of long-acting insulins (degludec and glargine) among type 2 diabetic Asian Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 93%
- Impact of Losartan on Portal hypertension and Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review 93%
- A Novel Maxillofacial Technology for Drug Administration-A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Metronidazole. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Non-Pharmacologic Strategies on Prevention or Management of Intensive Care Unit Delirium: A Systematic Review 92%
- Findings of a feasibility study of pre-operative pulmonary rehabilitation to reduce post-operative pulmonary complications in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease scheduled for major abdominal surgery. 90%
- Bacterial and Fungal Co-Infections among ICU COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in a Palestinian Hospital: Incidence and Antimicrobial Stewardship 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse events of iron and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy in preoperatively anaemic elective surgery patients: a systematic review 92%
- Quantification of the association between predisposing health conditions, demographic, and behavioural factors with hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
- Evidence-Based, Cost-Effective Interventions To Suppress The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic review and Network Meta-analysis of pharmaceutical interventions used to manage chronic pain 96%
- Effects of different environmental intervention durations on the intestinal mucosal barrier and the brain-gut axis in rats with colorectal cancer 92%
- Optimizing hospital opioid deprescribing: a multi-level consensus study bridging evidence, expertise, and patient perspectives 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.