Back

Vivaray Hb pro noninvasive hemoglobin device: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study measuring agreement with a calibrated blood cell counter

Kumar, D.; Kapoor, S.; Gowda, A.; Gupta, D.; Mittal, H.; Sood, S.

2026-07-01 hematology
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356869 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Non-invasive hemoglobin measurement offers a painless and rapid alternative to conventional blood-based testing. The Vivaray Hb pro is a handheld photoplethysmography-based device designed for point-of-care hemoglobin assessment without blood sampling. We evaluated the clinical performance of the Vivaray Hb pro by comparing device-generated hemoglobin values with those obtained from a calibrated laboratory blood cell counter. Methods: In this cross-sectional, non-randomized clinical performance study, participants aged [≥]8 years were prospectively recruited. Hemoglobin was measured non-invasively using the Vivaray Hb pro and compared with venous blood samples analyzed on a calibrated Coulter counter. Agreement between methods was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, including regression-based evaluation for proportional bias. Mean absolute error (MAE) and proportions of measurements within tolerance limits were also calculated. Complete paired measurements were available for 763 individuals. Results: Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated hemoglobin-dependent bias, with overestimation at lower hemoglobin levels and underestimation at higher levels. Regression-based analysis showed proportional bias ({beta}? = -0.178), indicating decreasing difference with increasing hemoglobin concentration. The MAE was 1.5 g/dL but was lower (1.2) in the clinically predominant ranges of 8.1-13 g/dl. Comment: The results support the use of the Vivaray Hb pro as a noninvasive hemoglobin screening and point-of-care assessment tool, particularly in settings where rapid, painless, and repeatable measurements are desirable.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 2%
42.4%
2
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.3%
5
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
8
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
9
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
12
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
Transfusion
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
14
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
16
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
18
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
20
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
22
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
29
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%