Back

Physical function domain associations with cognitive domains in community-dwelling older adults

Kim, J.; Herrera, B.; Wessinger, C.; Armstrong, B.; Etnier, J. L.; Park, K. S.

2026-07-01 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356840 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Physical and cognitive aging do not occur uniformly, yet associations between specific physical function and cognitive domains in sedentary older adults remain unclear. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined associations between multiple physical function domains and cognitive outcomes in sedentary, community-dwelling, cognitively unimpaired older adults. Methods: Fifty-eight older adults (70.7{+/-}4.7 years; 84.5% Female) completed handgrip strength, 30-second chair stand, timed up and go (TUG), brisk walk, and 6-minute walk (6MWT) assessment. Cognitive outcomes included global cognition using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and working memory, episodic memory, attentional inhibition, and cognitive flexibility using the NIH Toolbox. Linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, education, body mass index, and brachial pulse pressure. False discovery rate (FDR) correction was applied. Results: Greater 6MWT distance was associated with better episodic memory performance after FDR correction ({beta}=0.49, pa=0.028). Additional inverse associations were observed between TUG performance and global cognition ({beta}=-0.34, pa=0.166) and attentional inhibition ({beta}=-0.32, pa=0.180), and between gait speed and global cognition ({beta}=-0.33, pa=0.166) and episodic memory performance ({beta}=-0.32, pa=0.166), however, these did not survive FDR correction. Handgrip strength and chair stand performance were not associated with cognitive outcomes. Conclusions: These exploratory findings suggest that locomotor-based functional tasks may demonstrate stronger cognitive associations than strength measures in sedentary, cognitively unimpaired older adults. Tasks involving sustained locomotion and adaptive movement may place greater cognitive-motor demands, potentially increasing sensitivity to subtle cognitive variation. Larger longitudinal and multimodal studies are needed to determine whether these associations reflect reliable differential patterns across physical and cognitive domains.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.3%
2
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
3
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
5
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.9%
6
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
7
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.3%
10
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
12
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
13
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Aging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
17
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
19
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%