Back

Causally measuring aging and rejuvenation through transcriptomic damage

Zhang, S.; Iqbal, S.; Tyshkovskiy, A.; Gladyshev, V. N.

2026-06-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.26.734659 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aging is caused, fully in large part, by the progressive accumulation of damage, yet quantifying age-related damage across tissues and conditions remains a challenge. Here, we present a computational framework to quantify damage from standard RNA-sequencing data. It captures four classes of aberrant transcript structures, including premature termination upon intron retention, domain-disrupting splice variants, repeat elements, and gene fusion events, each reflecting distinct forms of RNA integrity loss. Using this method, we revealed a robust age-associated increase in transcriptomic damage across tissues. To integrate these measurements into a unified biomarker, we constructed a transcriptomic damage-based aging (tDamAge) clock using machine learning models trained across mouse tissues or human peripheral blood. It could predict age and detect transcriptomic shifts under both pro-aging and anti-aging conditions. Progeroid models exhibited accelerated tDamAge, whereas interventions such as caloric restriction, rapamycin, and methionine restriction lowered tDamAge. Cross-dataset analysis showed that diverse anti-aging interventions converge on shared transcriptomic signatures, particularly RNA processing and chromatin organization pathways, and these age-associated patterns could be reversed by interventions. We further identified elevated damage age acceleration in Alzheimers disease and observed rejuvenation-like reductions during embryonic development. Together, our findings establish transcriptomic damage as a causal, quantifiable and biologically interpretable feature of aging and demonstrate that tDamAge could detect age progression, acceleration, deceleration, and reversal.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 5%
22.8%
2
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
3
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.6%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.9%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
6
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 12%
3.3%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.3%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
13
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
14
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
15
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.2%
19
Autophagy
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
22
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
24
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%
26
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
27
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
28
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%