Back

Let's Be Black Excellence: How Black Students Navigate Exclusionary and Affirming Racialized Peer Interactions in Active Learning College Science Classrooms

Russo-Tait, T.; Nichols, H. M.; Swanson, T. C.

2026-06-29 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.06.21.733226 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Racial equity remains a critical challenge in postsecondary science education, as Black students experience higher attrition rates and diminished well-being compared to their White peers. While active learning has been shown to reduce failure rates and narrow achievement gaps, the interpersonal affordances and constraints of peer discussions within these settings remain underexplored for Black students. Grounded in Critical Race Theory and utilizing the analytical lenses of racial microaggressions, microaffirmations, and Community Cultural Wealth, this study addresses this issue by investigating the racialized interpersonal experiences of Black students in active learning college science classrooms. Through semi-structured interviews, this study explores the nature of both exclusionary and affirming peer interactions and how students navigate these dynamics. Findings reveal that Black students frequently encounter racialized microaggressions--manifestations of macro-level anti-Blackness-- in the classroom which contribute to isolation and racial battle fatigue. Conversely, students describe instances of microaffirmations, predominantly through small counterspaces created by and for other students of color, which validate their intellectual contributions and foster a sense of belonging. Despite facing these tensions, participants advocate for active learning as a beneficial practice, provided that instructors implement explicit, equitable structures and facilitate culturally responsive classroom climates. These findings offer actionable implications for researchers and practitioners to design more inclusive active learning environments by explicitly addressing interpersonal dynamics, promoting cultural competence, and co-constructing humanizing science classroom climates.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
54.0%
50% of probability mass above
2
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
4
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
6
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
8
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
10
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
11
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
14
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
16
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
19
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%