Back

A network approach to DNA methylation clocks

Carcedo, A.; Yang, S.-G.; Smiljanic, J.; Neunman, M.; Wennstedt, S.; Degerman, S.; Lizana, L.

2026-06-20 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.18.733218 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biological age predicts health and lifespan better than chronological age, but remains difficult to measure. One leading molecular proxy for biological age is DNA methylation, which underlies age predictors known as "clocks". These clocks use penalized linear regression to predict chronological age from methylation levels using selected cytosine-guanine pairs (CpGs) along DNA. Although they predict chronological age within a few years and track mortality risk, there are several issues. Different clocks share a vanishingly small number of CpG sites, many of which show weak associations with age. Also, the clocks often do not transfer across methylation array platforms. This paper takes a network approach to better understand these issues. By using 12 public datasets from human blood, we build a co-methylation network of the sites that show the strongest age correlation. After pruning weak links, we find that it has a small number of large modules of covarying CpGs surrounded by many small modules and singleton sites. These modules are biologically interpretable, as they are associated with CpG island contexts and enriched for distinct Gene Ontology functions. We also map five established clocks onto this network (Horvath, Hannum, AltumAge, Skin & Blood, and Han) and find that they select some CpGs from the same module. This suggests that they are more similar than they appear. The network structure also suggests new ways to build clocks. A simple clock that retains one CpG per module matches the performance of established clocks. A second one, built from module-level principal components, outperforms all five established clocks in three validation cohorts and is transferable across array platforms (Illumina Infinium Methylation 450K or EPIC arrays). Overall, the network perspective shifts attention from individual CpG sites to modules of covarying sites. This perspective helps explain why DNA methylation clocks perform so well despite their differences and provides a more systematic approach for developing the next generation of aging biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.2%
3
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
4
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
5
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.5%
7
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
8
Clinical Epigenetics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
15
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.4%
17
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
21
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
22
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
23
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
25
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
26
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
29
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%