Back

Development of a Complement Hemolysis Assay Using Aldehyde-Modified Human Erythrocytes

Pollo, B. A. L. V.; Ong, R. A.; Climacosa, F. M.; Caoili, S. E.

2026-06-21 immunology
10.64898/2026.06.16.732604 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundComplement-mediated hemolysis assays are essential for assessing immune function and diagnosing complement-related disorders. Conventional human erythrocyte derivatization with 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) can induce nonspecific hemolysis and optical interference, complicating interpretation. Identifying a more biocompatible electrophile could improve assay specificity and reliability. MethodsA panel of aldehydes was screened for electrophilicity using a nucleophile consumption assay with glycine as a model nucleophile. Glyoxylic acid was selected based on reactivity, solubility, and visual neutrality, then neutralized with sodium bicarbonate to minimize baseline hemolysis. Human erythrocytes were sequentially treated with pancreatin and glyoxylic acid to generate glyoxylic acid-pancreatin-treated erythrocytes (GxPEs). Complement-mediated hemolysis was assessed using normal human serum, heat-inactivated serum, and pathway-specific conditions, with CH50 values calculated for total, alternative, and non-alternative pathways. ResultsGxPEs exhibited robust complement-specific hemolysis (maximum 93.56%) with negligible background activity in heat-inactivated serum. CH50 analysis confirmed activation via both alternative (0.9514 L) and non-alternative (1.963 L) pathways. Reconstitution experiments with factor B-depleted cryoprecipitate and cryosupernatant fractions demonstrated dependence on small complement components such as C2 and C4. ConclusionsGlyoxylic acid derivatization yields a reproducible, optically quiet, and complement-specific erythrocyte substrate suitable for functional hemolysis assays. This method offers a practical platform for complement diagnostics, research applications, and therapeutic evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Transfusion
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.1%
3
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.7%
5
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.0%
6
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
7
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
The Analyst
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
11
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Journal of Virological Methods
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
16
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Glycobiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
STAR Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.1%
24
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
25
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
27
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
28
Bioscience Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
29
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
30
BMC Research Notes
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%