Back

Black women undergraduates' perspectives on how mentors and role models shape their beliefs about the attainability of science research careers

Joseph, W.; Dolan, E. L.; Tuma, T. T.

2026-06-17 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.06.15.731690 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Undergraduate research experiences offer important paths into scientific research careers, yet students do not experience them uniformly. For Black women, these experiences occur within racialized and gendered environments that may shape whether they perceive research careers as attainable. Yet little is known about these influences, including how mentors, role models, and institutional contexts, could support or limit Black womens beliefs about research career attainability. To advance our understanding of these influences, we conducted interviews with 23 Black women who participated in undergraduate research at 18 institutions in the United States, including historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and predominantly White institutions (PWIs). We conducted qualitative content analysis to understand Black women undergraduate researchers perceptions of the attainability of a scientific research career, including the influences of their mentors, role models, and institutional context. Three main themes emerged. First, Black women undergraduates varied in the importance they placed on sharing racial and gender identities with mentors and role models; some viewed such similarities as highly meaningful while others described them as less influential. Second, Black women undergraduates described that mentors and role models who shared similar life experiences, values, attitudes, or beliefs contributed to perceptions that scientific research careers were attainable, regardless of gender or racial similarity. Third, institutional context (HBCU, PWI) shaped how mentoring and role modeling influenced Black women undergraduates perceptions of research career attainability. We conclude by offering recommendations for individuals seeking to support Black women in undergraduate research and in their pursuit of research careers.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 1%
47.2%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
FASEB BioAdvances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
5
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
7
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
9
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
12
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
20
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
22
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%