Back

Knowledge And Compliance To Occupational Radiation Protection In Endovascular Procedures: A National Cross-Sectional Survey Among Vascular Surgeons In Brazil

Louzada, A. C. S.; dos Santos, C. A.; Ponte, B. J.; Matsumura, J.; Epifanio, E. A.; Sorbello, C. C. J.; Zerati, A. E.; Joviliano, E. E.; Wolosker, N.

2026-06-26 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.15.26355263 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: The advent of Endovascular surgery and the use of fluoroscopy-guided procedures have grown in the last decade, and with that increased the exposure of surgeons to cumulative ionizing radiation, increasing the risk of occupational health complications. Despite established radiation protection principles, adherence to radioprotection measures and surveillance practices remains uncertain in many settings. This study aimed to evaluate knowledge, availability, and implementation of radiation protection strategies among vascular surgeons in Brazil Metology: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted in February 2026 using an anonymous online questionnaire distributed to all active members of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery (SBACV). Associations between participant characteristics and radioprotection practices were explored using chi-square or Fishers exact tests. Results: Of 4,698 invited members, 192 vascular surgeons met the inclusion criteria. Most participants were male (67.4%), with a mean age of 45.9 years and a median of 12 years of experience performing fluoroscopy-guided procedures. Basic PPE use, particularly lead aprons, was nearly universal; however, adherence to other protective measures was substantially lower. Most respondents reported employing radiation-reduction strategies, including minimizing fluoroscopy time (98.9%), collimation (90.6%), optimized table and detector positioning (88.3%), procedural planning (87.2%), and pulsed fluoroscopy (81.0%). Only 19.4% reported undergoing annual medical surveillance for radiation-related health effects. Cataracts were the most frequently reported radiation-associated condition (6.2%). Greater age and professional experience were associated with higher utilization of selected protective measures and advanced imaging strategies. Conclusion: The study provides important insights into how radiation protection is currently understood and implemented in contemporary Brazilian vascular surgery practice. The incomplete use of personal protective equipment (PPE), with many justifications in addition to the low surveillance of the effects of radiation on health, brings us an alert about the reality in Brazil.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
32.4%
2
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.6%
4
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.9%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
8
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
22
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
23
Emergency Medicine Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%