Back

High school science fair: Characterizing student communication and presentation practices and their association with SEF outcomes

Grinnell, F.; Dalley, S.; Reisch, J.

2026-06-12 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.06.10.731420 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information is one of the eight Science and Engineering Practices in the National Research Council framework that underlies Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Scientific inquiry requires evaluation and communication of research findings. These skills are part of scientific inquiry itself. The goal of this study was to characterize the communication practices students used during Science and Engineering Fairs (SEFs). To examine these practices, we included the following question in our online anonymous and voluntary national high school SEF surveys carried out during 2021-22 and 2022-23, "What types of communication and presentation skills did you use in your science fair project?" The possible answers were literature review; research notebook; software to prepare tables, graphs, or images; written report; poster board preparation; PowerPoint presentation; and interview with the judges. Literature review and research notebook are part of developing research questions and data collection. Software to prepare tables, graphs, or images, and PowerPoint presentation contribute to analyzing research and developing a presentation. Written reports, poster board preparation, and interviews with the judges provide the opportunity to present the findings. Overall, 1789 students answered the question. The percentage of students utilizing these skills ranged from 17.3% doing a literature review to 67.6% preparing a poster board. On average, students indicated the use of three skills. Poster board preparation and interview with the judges were selected by students more than twice as frequently as literature review and research notebook. More positive SEF outcomes were associated with a greater number of skills used by students. Among the different skills, use of a research notebook showed the strongest association. In this paper, we present the findings and discuss implications regarding use of notebooks and other communication and presentation skills in students SEF experiences and engagement with scientific inquiry.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
34.3%
2
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
4
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
6
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
8
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
FASEB BioAdvances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.0%
11
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
13
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.5%
28
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
29
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%