Back

Optimisation of steatotic liver disease screening algorithm for resource-poor settings using machine learning

Mettananda, C.; Sivasumithran, K.; Ranaweera, L.; Madhubhashini, A.; Ranawaka, C.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Dassanayake, A.

2026-06-10 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.06.09.26355306 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The European Association for the Study of the Liver (ESAL) - Steatotic Liver Disease (SLD) screening algorithm involves two steps; initial screening with FIB-4 followed by referral for vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) in patients likely to have significant fibrosis (SF). However, VCTE is not widely available in resource-limited settings. Aim To optimise the EASL SLD screening algorithm for resource-poor settings using machine learning (ML). Methods We analysed data from 964 adults aged [≥]35 years who underwent VCTE at a tertiary referral centre in Sri Lanka between November 2024 and 2025. Multiple ML models using different methods and variable combinations were trained on 80% of the dataset and tested on the remaining 20%. Best models were selected based on performance and externally validated using data from 430 patients who underwent VCTE before November 2024. Model performance was compared with the FIB-4 using confusion matrices. Results A Random Forest model incorporating age, AST, ALT, and platelet count separately, rather than using FIB-4, outperformed. The all-variable ML model showed the best predictive performance for SF, with accuracy of 77.2%, recall of 0.762, precision of 0.778, and AUC-ROC of 0.818. The variables used in the model, in descending order of feature importance, were AST, platelet count, BMI, ALT, age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, sex, family history, hypothyroidism, diabetes complication and smoking. External validation demonstrated 75.1% accuracy and an AUC of 0.779. When used as the first step of the SLD screening algorithm, the all-variable ML model identified 37 (17.1%) additional true positives and reduced false-negative diagnoses by 50% compared with FIB-4. Conclusions ML-based models were more effective than the FIB-4 score as the first-line screening tool for VCTE referral, substantially improving the identification of patients with significant fibrosis in this South Asian cohort.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
3
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
4
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%