Back

Development of an Exploratory Taxonomy for Veterinary Professionals' AI Query Patterns Across Clinical Stages: An Expert Panel Study

Huh, C.; Huh, H.; Ahn, J.; Park, M.

2026-06-09 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.06.07.730654 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background/ObjectivesThe integration of large language model (LLM)-based AI tools into veterinary clinical practice is rapidly increasing; however, no systematically derived taxonomy of veterinary AI query patterns has been established. This study aimed to develop and refine an exploratory taxonomy of veterinary AI query patterns across clinical stages through a structured expert-panel review process. MethodsAn exploratory cross-sectional expert panel study was conducted. 5,372 real-world query logs from a veterinary clinical AI chatbot deployed over eight months were analyzed using AI-assisted inductive coding to derive an initial taxonomy. The taxonomy was refined through literature review and subsequently reviewed by an expert panel of 38 veterinary professionals via structured online survey across five clinical stages. ResultsA taxonomy of 3 categories and 21 subtypes was established: Clinical Support Queries (Types A-H), Evidence-Based Research Queries (Types I-L), and Terminology and Drug Reference Queries (Types M-U). Type B (Differential Reasoning) had the highest overall frequency (57/188 first-choice responses), while Type D (Clinical Decision Support) was dominant immediately post-consultation (55.3%). Veterinary professionals with [&ge;]10 years of experience showed a higher frequency of Type G (Evidence Search) preference than those with <10 years of experience (18 vs. 4), while university-affiliated professionals demonstrated a distinct pattern dominated by Type G. ConclusionsTo our knowledge, no published study has previously established a veterinary-specific, clinical-stage-sensitive exploratory taxonomy of AI query patterns; this study addresses that gap. The findings provide a foundational framework for designing context-aware, stage-adaptive veterinary AI systems and benchmark evaluation tools.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.2%
2
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Lab Animal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
5
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
9
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
11
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
17
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
24
Archives of Disease in Childhood
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
27
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%