Back

Comparative analysis of neuronal proteolytic pathways reveals neuron-specific and sub-compartmental-specific capacities with aging

Sleiman, M.; Ranti, D.; Baskaran, S.; Kreis, P.; Muth, S.; Gallrein, C.; Muenster-Wandowski, A.; Rahnis, N.; Cirri, E.; Eickholt, B. J.; Kirstein, J.

2026-06-04 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.02.729733 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proteostasis is essential for maintaining neuronal function, and its dysregulation is a hallmark of aging and neurodegeneration. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and macroautophagy are the two major proteolytic pathways responsible for protein degradation. However, their capacity and regulation differ between cell types and across aging. To elucidate the activity of both proteolytic pathways with aging, we performed a comparative analysis of the activity of UPS and macroautophagy in distinct neuronal subcellular compartments, in the cytosol and at synaptic terminals, across aging in neurons of Mus musculus (mouse) and Caenorhabditis elegans (nematode). In mice, our results identified differences between brain areas. While the cortical proteasomal activity declined with aging in both the cytoplasmic as well as synaptic neuronal subcompartments, the cerebellar proteasomal activity decreased only in the cytoplasmic compartment with aging. In C. elegans, we detected a decrease of proteasomal activity in both cytoplasmic and synaptic compartments of neurons. Interestingly, we observed a dysregulation of macroautophagy in both neuronal subcompartments of the cortex and cerebellum in mice as well as in C. elegans neurons with aging. Thus, we uncovered neuron-specific and subcompartmental-specific proteolytic capacities with aging that could manifest in different neuronal vulnerabilities for proteotoxic challenges with aging.

Published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (predicted rank #9) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.