Back

ChooseMyStat: A Web-Based Interactive Tool for Statistical Test Selection and Analysis Plan Generation in Clinical Research

Srivastava, S.; Punyani, S. R.; Vazalwar, D.; Joshi, A.; Pakhare, A. P.

2026-06-03 medical education
10.64898/2026.06.02.26354730 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Postgraduate medical residents frequently face difficulty in selecting appropriate statistical tests and preparing statistical analysis plans (SAPs) for thesis work. Existing resources often identify statistical tests without guiding implementation, reporting or software execution. Aims: To describe the development, features and content validation of ChooseMyStat, a free, open source, web based interactive tool for statistical test selection and SAP text generation in clinical research. Methods: ChooseMyStat was developed as a React based web application using an iterative, AI assisted development process under direct faculty supervision. The tool uses a branching decision algorithm covering 18 inferential statistical tests, two diagnostic accuracy measures, four agreement/reliability statistics, and four descriptive statistics scenarios. For each recommendation, it generates a SAP template paragraph, a results reporting example, step by step JASP instructions, and R code. Content validation was performed using 105 open-access original research articles from 15 broad medical specialties published in Indian journals during 2024 2025. Results: The tool covers commonly used statistical methods, including t tests, ANOVA, chi square variants, non parametric alternatives, correlation, regression (linear, logistic, ordinal), survival analysis, methods for clustered or repeated data, diagnostic accuracy measures, and agreement/reliability statistics. Among 365 statistical tests identified across 105 articles (excluding normality checking procedures), 346 (94.8%) were covered by the tool. Complete coverage of all statistical methods used was observed in 86 of 105 articles (81.9%). Conclusions: ChooseMyStat integrates statistical test selection with implementation guidance, SAP generation, reporting support and software instructions within a single interface. The tool may support postgraduate research training by improving accessibility to applied biostatistics guidance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
6
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
9
Research Synthesis Methods
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
16
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
25
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%