ChooseMyStat: A Web-Based Interactive Tool for Statistical Test Selection and Analysis Plan Generation in Clinical Research
Srivastava, S.; Punyani, S. R.; Vazalwar, D.; Joshi, A.; Pakhare, A. P.
Show abstract
Background: Postgraduate medical residents frequently face difficulty in selecting appropriate statistical tests and preparing statistical analysis plans (SAPs) for thesis work. Existing resources often identify statistical tests without guiding implementation, reporting or software execution. Aims: To describe the development, features and content validation of ChooseMyStat, a free, open source, web based interactive tool for statistical test selection and SAP text generation in clinical research. Methods: ChooseMyStat was developed as a React based web application using an iterative, AI assisted development process under direct faculty supervision. The tool uses a branching decision algorithm covering 18 inferential statistical tests, two diagnostic accuracy measures, four agreement/reliability statistics, and four descriptive statistics scenarios. For each recommendation, it generates a SAP template paragraph, a results reporting example, step by step JASP instructions, and R code. Content validation was performed using 105 open-access original research articles from 15 broad medical specialties published in Indian journals during 2024 2025. Results: The tool covers commonly used statistical methods, including t tests, ANOVA, chi square variants, non parametric alternatives, correlation, regression (linear, logistic, ordinal), survival analysis, methods for clustered or repeated data, diagnostic accuracy measures, and agreement/reliability statistics. Among 365 statistical tests identified across 105 articles (excluding normality checking procedures), 346 (94.8%) were covered by the tool. Complete coverage of all statistical methods used was observed in 86 of 105 articles (81.9%). Conclusions: ChooseMyStat integrates statistical test selection with implementation guidance, SAP generation, reporting support and software instructions within a single interface. The tool may support postgraduate research training by improving accessibility to applied biostatistics guidance.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 93%
- GPT for RCTs?: Using AI to measure adherence to reporting guidelines 93%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 94%
- A proposed de-identification framework for a cohort of children presenting at a health facility in Uganda 94%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The TARCiS statement: Guidance on terminology, application, and reporting of citation searching 94%
- Clinical Decision Support in Cardiovascular Medicine: Effectiveness, Implementation Barriers, and Regulation 92%
- Development and validation of the Symptom Burden Questionnaire™ for Long Covid: A Rasch analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Common misconceptions held by health researchers when interpreting linear regression assumptions, a cross-sectional study 95%
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 94%
- Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: an international cross-sectional survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.