Back

Contributions of immune cell biomarkers to explaining differences in mortality risk by sex in the Health and Retirement Study

Yin, M. A.; Nguyen, V.; Nathan, A.; Patel, C.

2026-05-29 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354256 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: It is well-established that males have a higher mortality risk than females. Immune cells and their function are known to undergo characteristic changes during aging, and immune cells are known to have sex differences. Immune cells and their function have been linked to mortality risk, but no studies have investigated to what degree, if at all, Immune Cell Biomarkers (ICBs) contribute to the known differences in mortality risk by sex. Methods: Using participant data from the Health and Retirement Study (n = 8,822), we applied multivariable linear regressions adjusting for age, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus, sex, and race/ethnicity to identify differences by sex in 48 immune cell biomarker (ICB, e.g. T cells, B cells, Monocytes, etc.) percentages and counts (measured in 2016). We studied how the associations between ICBs and mortality risk differ by sex using stratified Cox Proportional Hazard (CPH) models. We estimated how inclusion of sex explained the relationship between ICBs and all-cause mortality, and conversely, how inclusion of individual and all ICBs combined explain the relationship between sex and all-cause mortality using multivariable modeling approaches. Results: Differences in ICBs by sex range between 2-38% (39/48 statistically significant). 9 ICBs were significantly associated with mortality risk in the entire sample. While different ICBs were significantly associated with mortality risk in the stratified analyses, particularly with respect to monocyte, B cell, and NK cell populations, adjusting for sex modestly influenced the hazard ratios of the ICBs (sex: 8 ICBs, percent change <5.4%). Furthermore, individual and cumulative contributions of ICBs in explaining the differences in mortality risk by sex were not significant.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
3
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
4
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.9%
6
Clinical Epigenetics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Demographic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
8
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
10
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
11
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
13
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.1%
16
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Psychoneuroendocrinology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Hormones and Behavior
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%