Consumer Opinions, Lot-to-Lot Variability, and Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Melatonin Products: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial
Bonilla, K.; Sherman, V. M.; Arbaiza, A. S.; Dougherty, M.; Olson, L. E.
Show abstract
In some countries, melatonin is sold without a physician prescription and dosage is unregulated. Transdermal products have become popular including those marketed for children. We measured consumer assumptions about these products among adult residents of the United States, analyzed lot-to-lot variability, and compared the pharmacokinetics of melatonin administered in oral, lotion, and bath product forms. Survey respondents (n=199) believed oral melatonin was more effective than transdermal products and that all melatonin products were relatively safe. Melatonin lotion products analyzed by HPLC displayed lot-to-lot variability as well as changes in formulation and product claims. To determine pharmacokinetics, three different treatments (oral tablets, lotion, and bath immersion) were administered to twelve undergraduate participants in a randomized, crossover design. Five additional participants completed bath product treatment only. Participants collected saliva samples up to 48 hours after administration, which were analyzed for melatonin by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Oral (n=11) and lotion formulations (n=12) caused maximum salivary melatonin levels within 30 minutes after administration, but bath immersion did not cause increases in saliva melatonin (n=17). The half-life of oral melatonin was 1.17 [0.69 -- 1.65] hours versus 5.72 [3.75 -- 7.68] hours for lotion treatment (p = 0.011, effect size r = 0.770). Melatonin lotion may pose a risk to consumers who assume it is safe and less effective than oral tablets, when in fact it may be very potent and remain at high physiological levels into the following day. This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06382610) and was funded by the Sleep Research Society.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Within-subjects ultra-short sleep-wake protocol for characterising circadian variations in retinal function 93%
- Stability of extemporaneously compounded amiloride nasal spray 93%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Strategy to Treat COVID-19 Disease with Targeted Delivery of Inhalable Liposomal Hydroxychloroquine: A Non-clinical Pharmacokinetic Study 89%
- A randomized, controlled, feasibility study of RD-X19 in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting 89%
- A long-acting GDF15 analog causes robust, sustained weight loss and reduction of food intake in an obese non-human primate model 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preclinical Efficacy in Investigator’s Brochures: Stakeholders’ views on measures to improve Completeness and Robustness 89%
- Anti-thyroid drug use during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of birth defects in offspring: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies with methodological considerations 89%
- External validation of the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models for phenobarbital in pediatric patients 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronicling menstrual cycle patterns across the reproductive lifespan with real world data 91%
- The relationship between subjective sleep quality and cognitive performance in healthy young adults: Evidence from three empirical studies 90%
- Acute effects of psilocybin on the dynamics of gaze fixations during visual aesthetic perception 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Sweeteners in US-Marketed Oral Nicotine Pouch Products: Correlation with Nicotine Contents and Effects on Product Preference 90%
- Varenicline Versus Cytisine for Smoking Cessation in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial 89%
- Protective role of Cannabidiol against nicotine pouch-induced seizure aggravation and alterations in brain glymphatic biomarkers. 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.