Back

Consumer Opinions, Lot-to-Lot Variability, and Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Melatonin Products: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial

Bonilla, K.; Sherman, V. M.; Arbaiza, A. S.; Dougherty, M.; Olson, L. E.

2026-05-29 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354234 medRxiv
Show abstract

In some countries, melatonin is sold without a physician prescription and dosage is unregulated. Transdermal products have become popular including those marketed for children. We measured consumer assumptions about these products among adult residents of the United States, analyzed lot-to-lot variability, and compared the pharmacokinetics of melatonin administered in oral, lotion, and bath product forms. Survey respondents (n=199) believed oral melatonin was more effective than transdermal products and that all melatonin products were relatively safe. Melatonin lotion products analyzed by HPLC displayed lot-to-lot variability as well as changes in formulation and product claims. To determine pharmacokinetics, three different treatments (oral tablets, lotion, and bath immersion) were administered to twelve undergraduate participants in a randomized, crossover design. Five additional participants completed bath product treatment only. Participants collected saliva samples up to 48 hours after administration, which were analyzed for melatonin by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Oral (n=11) and lotion formulations (n=12) caused maximum salivary melatonin levels within 30 minutes after administration, but bath immersion did not cause increases in saliva melatonin (n=17). The half-life of oral melatonin was 1.17 [0.69 -- 1.65] hours versus 5.72 [3.75 -- 7.68] hours for lotion treatment (p = 0.011, effect size r = 0.770). Melatonin lotion may pose a risk to consumers who assume it is safe and less effective than oral tablets, when in fact it may be very potent and remain at high physiological levels into the following day. This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06382610) and was funded by the Sleep Research Society.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
5
Journal of Sleep Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.4%
7
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
12
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Biochemical Pharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Progress in Neurobiology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
24
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
30
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%