Back

Consumer Opinions, Lot-to-Lot Variability, and Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Melatonin Products: A Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial

Bonilla, K.; Sherman, V. M.; Arbaiza, A. S.; Dougherty, M.; Olson, L. E.

2026-05-29 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.05.27.26354234 medRxiv
Show abstract

In some countries, melatonin is sold without a physician prescription and dosage is unregulated. Transdermal products have become popular including those marketed for children. We measured consumer assumptions about these products among adult residents of the United States, analyzed lot-to-lot variability, and compared the pharmacokinetics of melatonin administered in oral, lotion, and bath product forms. Survey respondents (n=199) believed oral melatonin was more effective than transdermal products and that all melatonin products were relatively safe. Melatonin lotion products analyzed by HPLC displayed lot-to-lot variability as well as changes in formulation and product claims. To determine pharmacokinetics, three different treatments (oral tablets, lotion, and bath immersion) were administered to twelve undergraduate participants in a randomized, crossover design. Five additional participants completed bath product treatment only. Participants collected saliva samples up to 48 hours after administration, which were analyzed for melatonin by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Oral (n=11) and lotion formulations (n=12) caused maximum salivary melatonin levels within 30 minutes after administration, but bath immersion did not cause increases in saliva melatonin (n=17). The half-life of oral melatonin was 1.17 [0.69 -- 1.65] hours versus 5.72 [3.75 -- 7.68] hours for lotion treatment (p = 0.011, effect size r = 0.770). Melatonin lotion may pose a risk to consumers who assume it is safe and less effective than oral tablets, when in fact it may be very potent and remain at high physiological levels into the following day. This study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06382610) and was funded by the Sleep Research Society.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.9%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.2%
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
6
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.1%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.5%
10
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
25
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Biochemical Pharmacology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
29
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%