Health Care Students/Professionals Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Survey in Erbil, Iraq
Balisani, A.; Zand, D.; Virji-Babul, N.; Shallal, T. M. A.
Show abstract
Abstract Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare systems worldwide and medical schools worldwide have begun integrating AI into their curricula. The healthcare system in Iraq is currently undergoing development and AI has not yet been adopted in clinical practice in Erbil; in addition, no formal AI instruction has been incorporated into the medical education curriculum. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge levels, attitudes, and perceptions regarding AI among medical students and healthcare professionals in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Methods: A mixed-methods survey was distributed to medical students and residents in Erbil, Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The survey was adapted from Teng et al, and modified to reflect the local context. The survey was translated into Kurdish and Arabic. Convenience sampling was used. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), Version 26.0. Chi-square and Fishers exact tests were used to test associations between categorical variables. Mann Whitney U test was used to compare mean ranks between groups in the non-normally distributed data. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Thematic analysis was applied to open-ended qualitative responses by two independent reviewers. Results: A total of 368 participants participated in this study. The majority (85.6%) of participants felt that AI should be taught in schools and universities, and 90.8% reported using AI. ChatGPT was by far the most commonly used AI tool (85.3%). Participants aged 20-24 years (93.2%) and 25-29 years (90.2%) showed the highest prevalence of using AI. Participants that used AI previously, had higher scores for support for AI development in their field (U = 3744.5, P=0.001), feelings of hope towards AI in their field (U = 4406.5, P = 0.004) and thinking that students should learn the basics of AI (U = 4022.5, P = 0.03). Male participants were more likely to use AI in comparision with women (P=0.045). The most common concern regarding AI was loss of jobs (33.0%), followed by overreliance on AI (22.8%). Qualitative analysis revealed themes of guarded optimism, and concerns regarding the ethical implications of AI use in medicine. Conclusion: Medical students and physicians in Erbil are early adopters of AI in spite of any formal training. In parralel, most participants expressed dissatisfaction with their understanding of the ethical implications of AI in healthcare and emphasized the need for formal AI education in healthcare curricula. The majority of participants expressed guarded optimism regarding the future of AI in healthcare. A gender gap in AI was identified, consistent with global trends with implications for professional equity.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 98%
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 97%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 95%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical Opinions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: a nationwide cross-sectional study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
- Medical students'perceptions and attitudes towards the implementation of English as medium of instruction at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat 93%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 95%
- Machine Learning in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Education: A Survey of Postgraduate Students at a Swiss University 92%
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.