DNA Methylation Signatures of Atherosclerosis and Vascular-Related Outcomes in U.S. and Irish Population-Based Cohorts
Ammous, F.; Smith, T.; Scarlett, S.; Hernandez, B.; McCrory, C.; Kenny, R. A.; Mitchell, C.; Faul, J. D.
Show abstract
Atherosclerosis is a systemic vascular process linked to cardiovascular, cognitive and renal outcomes. DNA methylation (DNAm)-based scores of atherosclerosis may capture cumulative biological processes underlying vascular aging. Here, we examined associations of DNAm scores for coronary artery calcification (DNAm-CAC) and carotid plaque (DNAm-cPlaque), derived from a large study of imaging-based subclinical atherosclerosis, with prevalent and incident outcomes in two population-based cohorts of older adults: the Health and Retirement Study (HRS; n = 3,875) and The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA; n = 487). Higher DNAm scores were associated with adverse cardiometabolic profiles and socioeconomic indicators. In HRS, higher DNAm-CAC was associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease (odds ratio per SD, 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.26), lower cognitive function ({beta} = -0.50, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.32) and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; -1.7 ml min-1 1.73 m-2, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.8) in unadjusted models. After adjustment for demographic and clinical risk factors, DNAm-CAC ({beta} = -0.29, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.13) and DNAm-cPlaque ({beta} = -0.24, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.06) remained associated with lower cognitive function, and DNAm-cPlaque was associated with incident cognitive impairment or dementia (hazard ratio per SD, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32). Associations were attenuated after further adjustment for race/ethnicity and socioeconomic indicators. In TILDA, higher DNAm-cPlaque was associated with worse cognitive performance (incidence rate ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21), increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.42) and lower eGFR, with consistent associations observed for DNAm-CAC. These findings suggest that DNAm-based scores of atherosclerosis capture systemic vascular processes linked to multiple age-related outcomes across populations. Further work is needed to clarify the biological pathways reflected by these scores and their relation to cumulative and socially patterned vascular risk.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory impairment and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in older adults 94%
- Age at menopause and the risk of stroke: Observational and Mendelian Randomization analysis in 204,244 postmenopausal women 94%
- Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associate with Brain Arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: A Genome-Wide Association Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease performs well in individuals aged 70 years and older 95%
- Augmenting clinical risk prediction of cardiovascular disease through protein and epigenetic biomarkers 94%
- Dynamic Importance of Genomic and Clinical Risk for Coronary Artery Disease Over the Life Course 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subclinical Vascular Composites Predict Clinical Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke, and Dementia: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) 95%
- Insulin resistance potentiates the effect of remnant cholesterol on cardiovascular mortality in individuals without diabetes 94%
- Polygenic Hyperlipidemias and Coronary Artery Disease Risk 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Body fat and human cardiovascular ageing 93%
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 93%
- Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: prediction, attributable risk fraction and estimating benefits from novel interventions 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.