Back

hB-PAC: A non-invasive aging clock for quantifying individual differences in aging

Ando, Y.; Yada, Y.; Kashima, M.; Bessho, Y.; Hirata, H.; Naoki, H.; MATSUI, T.

2026-05-27 systems biology
10.64898/2026.05.22.727332 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aging progresses heterogeneously among individuals, and aging clocks that estimate biological age have been developed to quantify this heterogeneity. However, existing methods depend on invasive tissue sampling or long-term longitudinal data, and a mathematical framework that explicitly quantifies individual differences in aging has not yet been established. Here, we employed a progeroid zebrafish model (klotho mutant; kl-/-) and developed a hierarchical Bayesian framework, termed the hierarchical Bayesian-Multimodal Aging Clock (hB-MAC), which integrates non-invasive snapshot data of behavior and morphology with intestinal transcriptomic profiles. This model enables the simultaneous estimation of individual biological age while explicitly quantifying deviation from chronological age. Comparative analyses with biological datasets demonstrated that hB-MAC provides biologically meaningful age estimates while capturing inter-individual variability. Based on this framework, we further developed a new aging clock, the hierarchical Bayesian-Phenotypic Aging Clock (hB-PAC), which predicts individual biological age using only non-invasive data. The biological age estimated by hB-PAC was strongly associated with multiple tissue-level aging processes, including metabolic decline, intestinal barrier dysfunction, and abnormalities in mucosal immunity, which were not fully explained by chronological age. These results demonstrate that biologically relevant aging states incorporating individual variability can be inferred solely from short-term non-invasive observations. The proposed framework enables scalable inference of aging dynamics from macroscopic, non-invasive phenotypic data, providing a foundation for high-throughput evaluation of personalized anti-aging interventions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.6%
3
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
6
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.1%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 24%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
9
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
10
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.4%
15
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
17
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
18
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
20
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
22
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
23
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
24
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%