Back

Beyond student outcomes: How creating Open Educational Resources benefits authors in a research coordination network

Jithin, V.; Klemens, J. A.; McCulloch, L. A.; Hardin, R.; Seryak, L. M.; Russell, A.

2026-05-24 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.05.21.726463 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Open educational resources (OERs) contain authentic materials that benefit students, but few studies have focused on the benefits to authors of OERs. This gap needs attention considering the challenges that OER authors face, given their commitments to multiple professional activities while also being motivated to take part in OER development. It is critical to understand what benefits authors receive, to help in the continued development of these valuable educational tools. To this end, we investigated what benefits a specific group of researcher-educators perceived from investing their limited time and energy to design, create, and share authentic OERs in the OCELOTS (Online Content for Experiential Learning of Tropical Systems) Research Coordination Network in Undergraduate Biology Education. Our study was based on conceptual frameworks for teaching and learning, communities of practice, and self-determination theory. We used qualitative data from a survey specifically designed to address the question of benefits perceived by OER authors, complemented with quantitative and qualitative data from existing internal evaluations of this network. In a content-analysis framework, we analyzed the open-ended responses to identify broader themes emerging about author benefits. OER authors reported improved pedagogical practice, increased visibility of research and outreach efforts, professional rewards, and increased collaborations. Authors reported gains in pedagogical knowledge and personal fulfillment as benefits that they received, along with satisfaction from contributing to their discipline and society in general. While benefits around improving pedagogical practice was the richest theme, creation of modules also generated new collaborations and helped strengthen and broaden authors professional networks. In particular, the sense of belonging to and building the community was a significant benefit, providing implications for how to support future OER development and the critical role of peer networks. We discuss connections across these themes and compare our results with related previous studies. These results indicate that sustained investment in intentionally designed, interdisciplinary networks can generate substantial and diverse benefits for the educators and researchers who create these resources. Open Research StatementThe de-identified data associated with this manuscript will be permanently archived in Zenodo, upon the acceptance of the manuscript.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
22.8%
2
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
5
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.9%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
12
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
21
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%