Advancing brain health equity after traumatic brain injury: A multi-stakeholder global priority-setting study

The impact of social parameters on brain health among people with traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been extensively documented. However, translation of this evidence into policy and clinical practice remains limited. This may reflect a lack of coordinated and equity-driven approaches to brain health that integrate diverse stakeholder perspectives, limiting progress toward equity-oriented research and service delivery models. We conducted a convergent parallel mixed-methods study guided by the REporting guideline for PRIority SEtting of health research (REPRISE). We utilized the PROGRESS-Plus framework (Place of residence, Race/ethnicity, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, Social capital, and context-specific parameters) to ensure systematic consideration of social parameters in the study. For Objective 1, we synthesized existing evidence on social parameters and brain health outcomes. For Objective 2, we surveyed people with lived experience of TBI, family members/friends, clinicians, researchers, and community leaders across the globe to assess their prioritization of social parameters relevant to brain health. For Objective 3, we integrated evidence synthesis and stakeholder input through a structured Round Robin consensus activity to prioritize actionable areas for feasibility and impact. The activity culminated in the development of a knowledge mobilization agenda designed to inform equity-centred policy, research, and clinical practice. In Objective 1, we identified 59 publications with evidence on the effect of PROGRESS-Plus parameters on brain health outcomes following TBI. Meta-research highlighted that education, age, and country-level indicators are prognostic for brain health after TBI. In Objective 2, the highest-ranked priorities of 113 stakeholders across four continents (North America, Europe, Africa, and Oceania) were education, access to benefits, and income. These priorities were at the centre of discussion in Objective 3, which comprised idea sharing, refinement and thematic clustering, and a final prioritization poll. The resulting final 15 priorities were organized into two tracks: Track A, actions feasible in the short term, and Track B, longer-term implementation priorities. Building on this priority-setting process, co-created with stakeholders around the globe, the findings provide a roadmap for integration of social parameters in TBI research, knowledge exchange, policy, and practice.