Associations of Power Distance and Psychological Safety With Medical Researcher Well-being
Choi, J.; Kim, Y. J.; Luan, Y. L.
Show abstract
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES To examine whether psychological safety and power distance are associated with medical researchers' well-being, and whether these associations operate through team inclusiveness and conflict. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING A biomedical research institute at a major UK university. PARTICIPANTS 133 medical researchers from 17 teams, including 20 principal investigators and 113 team members. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and psychological detachment. Mediators were dimensions of team inclusiveness and team conflict. RESULTS Psychological safety had no significant direct associations with job satisfaction, life satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, or psychological detachment, but showed several indirect associations through researchers' team experiences. It was indirectly associated with higher job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation primarily through greater integration of differences, inclusion in decision making, or more constructive forms of conflict (bs=.23-.38, ps=.032-<.001).For psychological detachment, psychological safety showed conflicting indirect associations: it had the potential to support detachment through greater integration of differences and lower avoidant conflict (bs=.21-.56, ps=.054-.002), but to undermine detachment through greater inclusion in decision-making (b=-.26, p=.082). Power distance showed a different pattern. Most notably, it was positively associated with psychological detachment (b=.54, p=.062). However, power distance was indirectly associated with lower job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation, primarily through reduced integration of differences and greater dominating conflict (bs=-.14 to -.19, ps=.068-.020). CONCLUSIONS Common assumptions about psychological safety and power distance should be revisited. Psychological safety did not show strong direct benefits for researcher well-being, whereas power distance was not uniformly harmful and was positively associated with psychological detachment. A more nuanced understanding of both cultural dimensions is needed in medical research teams.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 95%
- Determinants Of Burnout And Other Aspects Of Psychological Well-Being In Healthcare Workers During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study 94%
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Physicians in the management and leadership of health care: A systematic review of the conditions conducive to organizational performance 93%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 91%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and Predictors of Depression among Training Physicians in China: A Comparison to the United States 90%
- Impact of Governmental interventions on epidemic progression and workplace activity during the COVID-19 outbreak 90%
- Loneliness and diurnal cortisol levels during COVID-19 lockdown: the roles of living situation, relationship status and relationship quality 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 91%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 91%
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 93%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 89%
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.