Back

The addition of transmural side holes to covered metal stents does not reduce the rate of premature bile duct stent occlusion or acute cholecystitis

Stendahl, A.; Yu, J. X.; Jazrawi, S.; Jonica, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Javia, S.; Sharzehi, K.; Cote, G.

2026-05-18 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353216 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Study Aims Fully covered, self expandable metal stents (FCSEMS) are used to treat biliary strictures. FCSEMS with transmural side holes may facilitate cystic duct drainage to mitigate risk of cholecystitis and impact other stent-related adverse events such as migration and occlusion. This study compared rates of premature stent occlusion and acute cholecystitis among patients with biliary strictures who underwent first time placement of a FCSEMS with or without transmural side holes. Patients and Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with FCSEMS between April 2022 to April 2025 for malignant or benign extrahepatic bile duct strictures. Patients were followed for a minimum of 9 months or through planned stent removal. The primary outcome was premature bile duct occlusion. The secondary outcome was acute cholecystitis among patients with an intact gallbladder. Results Among 219 patients meeting enrollment criteria, 57 (26%) had side holes. The rate of premature stent occlusion was similar with transmural side holes (12%) vs. without (11%, HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.42 2.43, p = 0.96). Among patients with an intact gallbladder (n=129), acute cholecystitis rates were similar with side holes (6%) or without (4.8%, HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.22 4.5, p = 0.99). Conclusions FCSEMS stents with side holes do not reduce rates of premature bile duct stent occlusion or acute cholecystitis compared to FCSEMS without side holes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.8%
3
Hepatology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.2%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
11
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Hepatology Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.6%
16
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
19
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Gastro Hep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
23
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%