Back

A Reproducible Pipeline for Processing Commercial Wearable Step-Count Data in Aging Cohorts: Application and Evaluation in the STRRIDE-PD Reunion Study

Bo, N.; Sudnick, A. M.; Counts, J. D.; Kennedy, K. G.; Saldana, A. A.; Collins-Bennett, K. A.; Bennett, W. C.; Johnson, J. L.; Huffman, K. M.; Paluch, A. E.; Ashner, M. C.; Kraus, W. E.; Peskoe, S. B.; Ross, L. M.

2026-05-19 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.14.26353213 medRxiv
Show abstract

Wearable devices offer the ability to objectively characterize free-living physical activity; however, raw step-count data generated by commercial devices require systematic processing before they can support rigorous inference. We describe a transparent, reproducible standard operating procedure (SOP) for transforming epoch-level step-count data from commercial Garmin devices into participant-level analytic variables and demonstrate its application in the STRRIDE-PD Reunion study: a long-term follow-up of older adults originally enrolled in a supervised exercise intervention trial. This data pipeline standardizes timestamps, reconstructs daily epoch grids, infers wear time from observed step patterns, and applies a prespecified valid-day threshold ([≥]10 hours inferred wear time) to generate participant-level summaries. Among 67 participants (mean age 71.4 years, 65.7% women), the median valid-day count was 10 days, median average daily steps were 5,794, and participant-level estimates were identical across [≥]10-hour and [≥]6-hour valid-day thresholds. Wearable-derived step counts were significantly associated with 9 of 16 cardiometabolic and fitness outcomes, including cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, and lipid profiles. By contrast, self-reported exercise - assessed via a frequency-by-duration composite ranked into deciles - was not significantly associated with any outcome. A regression calibration framework applied to the full sample quantified the attenuation underlying this discrepancy: the naive self-report model systematically underestimated associations relative to both the observed Garmin model and calibration-corrected estimates. These findings demonstrate that measurement approach is a determinant of scientific conclusions in physical activity research, and that reproducible wearable data pipelines are essential infrastructure for aging epidemiology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.0%
3
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.8%
5
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
8
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
11
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
13
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%
28
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%