Back

Optimizing Trastuzumab Duration: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Regimens for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Kenya

Mandaliya, P.; Barasa, E.; Aywak, D.; Okalebo, F.

2026-05-15 health economics
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353063 medRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer was the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide in 2022. In Kenya, more than a quarter of breast cancer patients have the aggressive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 positive subtype. Trastuzumab is recommended for its treatment, but high costs have limited access. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness and affordability of trastuzumab-based regimens to inform their adoption and use in Kenya. A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the healthcare payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Five trastuzumab-based regimens of varying durations (9-week, 6-month, 9-month, 12-month, and 24-month) were compared with chemotherapy alone. Direct medical costs were estimated using a bottom-up micro-ingredient approach. All costs were reported in 2022 USD. A cohort Markov state-transition model with a monthly cycle length was used to estimate the costs and outcomes for an open hypothetical cohort. Scenario, deterministic sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. A budget impact analysis estimated the financial implications of each regimen. The 9-week regimen had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 3,230 per QALY, while the remaining regimens had ICERs ranging from USD 4,046 to 9,846 per QALY. The findings were most sensitive to the price and quantity utilized per cycle of trastuzumab. A reimbursement cap of KES 40,000 per cycle reduced ICERs by up to 61%. Over five years, the 9-week regimen would account for 1.2% of the projected insurers budget, whereas the current recommended 12-month regimen would consume 2.82%. Although none of the regimens were cost-effective at Kenyas WTP threshold (USD 1054.80), the 9-week regimen may still be considered by policymakers given its greater affordability. Further cost reductions can be achieved through negotiating lower drug prices, improving access to biosimilars, and implementing vial sharing.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.9%
2
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.7%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
6
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
10
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
11
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
12
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
15
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
18
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
21
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
23
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
27
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
29
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%