Back

Optimizing Trastuzumab Duration: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Five Regimens for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Kenya

Mandaliya, P.; Barasa, E.; Aywak, D.; Okalebo, F.

2026-05-15 health economics
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353063 medRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer was the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide in 2022. In Kenya, more than a quarter of breast cancer patients have the aggressive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 positive subtype. Trastuzumab is recommended for its treatment, but high costs have limited access. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness and affordability of trastuzumab-based regimens to inform their adoption and use in Kenya. A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the healthcare payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Five trastuzumab-based regimens of varying durations (9-week, 6-month, 9-month, 12-month, and 24-month) were compared with chemotherapy alone. Direct medical costs were estimated using a bottom-up micro-ingredient approach. All costs were reported in 2022 USD. A cohort Markov state-transition model with a monthly cycle length was used to estimate the costs and outcomes for an open hypothetical cohort. Scenario, deterministic sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. A budget impact analysis estimated the financial implications of each regimen. The 9-week regimen had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of USD 3,230 per QALY, while the remaining regimens had ICERs ranging from USD 4,046 to 9,846 per QALY. The findings were most sensitive to the price and quantity utilized per cycle of trastuzumab. A reimbursement cap of KES 40,000 per cycle reduced ICERs by up to 61%. Over five years, the 9-week regimen would account for 1.2% of the projected insurers budget, whereas the current recommended 12-month regimen would consume 2.82%. Although none of the regimens were cost-effective at Kenyas WTP threshold (USD 1054.80), the 9-week regimen may still be considered by policymakers given its greater affordability. Further cost reductions can be achieved through negotiating lower drug prices, improving access to biosimilars, and implementing vial sharing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.6%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.8%
3
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
6
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Journal of Medical Economics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
Vaccine: X
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.4%
17
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Medical Decision Making
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.8%
26
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
30
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%