Back

Frailty-based prognostication of clinical outcomes in geriatric burn patients: a retrospective study

Lee, J. H.; Jinsi, M.; Feldman, M. J.; Hobgood, S.

2026-05-15 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.05.12.26353034 medRxiv
Show abstract

Burn trauma disproportionately impacts older adults, yet existing burn severity models emphasize age, total body surface area (TBSA), and inhalation injury without accounting for geriatric-specific vulnerabilities such as frailty. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 326 geriatric patients admitted with burn injuries between 2020 and 2024 to evaluate how TBSA, burn location, inhalation injury, renal insufficiency, comorbidities, and functional dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) affect in- hospital mortality and discharge disposition. Based on multivariable logistic regression and chi- square analyses, TBSA, as expected, emerged as the strongest predictor across models. Each 1% increase in TBSA was associated with a 7% increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality (p=0.006) and a 12 to 19% increase in odds of post-acute care placement (p<0.001). Inhalation injury and renal insufficiency were also independently associated with increased odds of both mortality and post-acute care disposition, whereas respiratory comorbidity predicted mortality alone. Functional status demonstrated outcome-specific prognostic value: ADL dependence predicted mortality, while IADL dependence predicted discharge disposition. Patients with some ADL dependence had five-fold higher odds of in-hospital mortality (p=0.011), while some (OR=2.48, p= 0.039) and full IADL dependence (OR=2.61, p=0.025) were associated with higher odds of post-acute care placement. Integrating structured functional assessments that distinguish basic from instrumental limitations alongside established burn severity metrics may enhance prognostication and guide individualized care planning for older adults with burn injuries.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
4
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
7
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.0%
10
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
15
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%