Back

Sex-differential associations of BMI polygenic scores in youth with the double burden of malnutrition

Nacis, J.; Ronquillo, D. G.; Serafico, M.; Bunhiyan, R.; Fernandez, M. G.; Cruz, K.; Jara, J. A.; Desnacido, J.; Ducay, A. J.; Ferrer, E.; Gonzales, G. B.; van Duijnhoven, F. J. B.

2026-05-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.11.26352947 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo examine associations of BMI-related polygenic scores (PGSs) with BMI-for-age z-score (BMIz), height-for-age z-score (HAZ), and weight; assess sex-specific effects; and test PGS-by-diet interactions in youth experiencing the double burden of malnutrition. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study of Filipino youth aged 6-19 years, we analyzed genome-wide genotype, anthropometric, and dietary data from two 24-hour recalls. Four ancestry-standardized BMI PGSs were evaluated using linear regression adjusted for age, sex, and ancestry principal components, with platform-specific estimates combined by fixed-effects meta-analysis. ResultsAll four PGSs were positively associated with BMIz ({beta} range: 0.119 - 0.320). The strongest association was observed for the multi-ancestry score PGS005202 ({beta} = 0.320; P = 2.39 x 10-9; {Delta}R2 = 4.98%). No PGS was associated with HAZ. PGS005202 and PGS005279 were associated with higher weight independent of HAZ. A significant PGS000716-by-sex interaction was observed for BMIz (q = 0.034), with an association in boys ({beta} = 0.253; P = 0.002) but not in girls ({beta} = -0.007; P = 0.93). No PGS-by-diet interaction remained significant after multiple-testing correction. ConclusionsBMI-related PGSs were associated with adiposity-related traits, but not linear growth, in Filipino youth. Findings support sex-stratified analyses and further evaluation of ancestry-inclusive PGSs in similar pediatric settings.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.