Retention and loss to follow-up among patients with hypertension in primary care: a multi-practice cohort study
Ye, J.; Song, A.
Show abstract
Effective hypertension management depends on sustained engagement with primary care, and there is a need to understand the magnitude and determinants of follow-up loss in real-world primary care. We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from 26,541 patients with hypertension across primary care practices participating in the EvidenceNOW quality-improvement initiative. We characterized retention in care, longitudinal blood pressure (BP) control, and predictors of loss to follow-up using descriptive statistics, cumulative retention curves, and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression. At baseline, mean systolic and diastolic BP were 140.0 {+/-} 20.6 and 84.7 {+/-} 13.0 mmHg, respectively; only 10.7% (95% CI 10.4-11.1) of patients had controlled BP and 18.1% never returned for any follow-up visit. Among the 21,729 patients who had [≥]1 follow-up encounter, retention declined steeply over time--from 59.9% at 6 months to 16.3% at 36 months. Patients identifying as Black/African American (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.44; 95% CI 1.33-1.56), Hispanic/Latino (aHR 1.43; 1.35-1.52), or Other race/ethnicity (aHR 1.50; 1.41-1.59) had significantly higher hazards of being lost to follow-up than White patients, whereas older age, female sex, comorbid diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and baseline BP control were each independently protective. Among patients retained for at least 12 months, BP control rose to 63.7% and remained near 64-66% through 36 months. These findings reveal a substantial and inequitable longitudinal care-engagement gap that is likely a principal driver of suboptimal hypertension control in the United States and identify actionable demographic and clinical targets for primary-care retention interventions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 96%
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 95%
- Projected Impact of Nonpharmacologic Management of Stage 1 Hypertension Among Lower-Risk US Adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha globin gene copy number and hypertension risk among Black Americans 95%
- Assessing the impact of community-based interventions on hypertension and diabetes management in three Minnesota communities: findings from the prospective evaluation of US HealthRise programs 94%
- Patterns of Adherence to Home BP Monitoring in the e-Framingham Heart Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- National Trends and Disparities in Hospitalization for Hypertensive Emergencies Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1999–2019 94%
- Effects of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Systolic Blood Pressure and Survival to Very Old Age. Results from the Women’s Health Initiative 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 95%
- Trajectories of Cognitive Decline Before and After New-onset Hypertension 93%
- High burden of non-adherence to blood pressure-lowering medications: meta-analysis of data from over 34,000 adults with hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends and variation in prescribing of suboptimal statin treatment regimes: a cohort study in English primary care 92%
- Association between oral anticoagulants and COVID-19 related outcomes: two cohort studies 89%
- Characterisation of type 2 diabetes subgroups and their association with ethnicity and clinical outcomes: a UK real-world data study using the East London Database 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.