Back

Retention and loss to follow-up among patients with hypertension in primary care: a multi-practice cohort study

Ye, J.; Song, A.

2026-05-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.10.26352856 medRxiv
Show abstract

Effective hypertension management depends on sustained engagement with primary care, and there is a need to understand the magnitude and determinants of follow-up loss in real-world primary care. We analyzed electronic health record (EHR) data from 26,541 patients with hypertension across primary care practices participating in the EvidenceNOW quality-improvement initiative. We characterized retention in care, longitudinal blood pressure (BP) control, and predictors of loss to follow-up using descriptive statistics, cumulative retention curves, and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression. At baseline, mean systolic and diastolic BP were 140.0 {+/-} 20.6 and 84.7 {+/-} 13.0 mmHg, respectively; only 10.7% (95% CI 10.4-11.1) of patients had controlled BP and 18.1% never returned for any follow-up visit. Among the 21,729 patients who had [≥]1 follow-up encounter, retention declined steeply over time--from 59.9% at 6 months to 16.3% at 36 months. Patients identifying as Black/African American (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.44; 95% CI 1.33-1.56), Hispanic/Latino (aHR 1.43; 1.35-1.52), or Other race/ethnicity (aHR 1.50; 1.41-1.59) had significantly higher hazards of being lost to follow-up than White patients, whereas older age, female sex, comorbid diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, stroke, and baseline BP control were each independently protective. Among patients retained for at least 12 months, BP control rose to 63.7% and remained near 64-66% through 36 months. These findings reveal a substantial and inequitable longitudinal care-engagement gap that is likely a principal driver of suboptimal hypertension control in the United States and identify actionable demographic and clinical targets for primary-care retention interventions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
4
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
11
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
18
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%