Back

Vitamin D Deficiency among Industrial Workers in Cikarang, Indonesia: Prevalence, Occupational Determinants, and Health Implications

Santi, T.; Setiabudiawan, T. P.; Aviani, J. K.; Alfaqih, M. S.; Jaqualina, C.; Nanova, A. F. R.; Saila, K. A. P.; Setiabudiawan, B.

2026-05-12 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.05.05.26351787 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence, determinants, and health associations of vitamin D deficiency among workers in Cikarang, Indonesia. MethodsCross-sectional study of 107 workers. Serum 25(OH)D was measured by ECLIA; deficiency was <20 ng/mL. Data included demographics, occupation, sun exposure, diet, anthropometry, laboratory parameters, and self-reported health. Analyses used t-test/Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and multivariable regression. ResultsDeficiency was prevalent (57.9%; median 18.6 ng/mL). Males had higher levels (+7.60 ng/mL) and lower risk (OR 8.56), while younger age (<38.5 years) showed lower levels (-5.60 ng/mL) and higher risk (OR 4.73; all p<0.0001). Greater sun exposure increased levels, whereas sunscreen use and greater clothing coverage reduced them. Only sex and age remained significant. ConclusionVitamin D deficiency is common, especially among female and younger workers, with modifiable sun-avoidance behaviors contributing. LEARNING OUTCOMESO_LISummarize the prevalence and key determinants of vitamin D deficiency among industrial workers in equatorial Indonesia, contributing to limited occupational health data in this setting. C_LIO_LIHighlight the role of modifiable behaviors--particularly sun exposure and sun-avoidance practices--in influencing vitamin D status among workers. C_LIO_LIEmphasize the need for targeted workplace interventions, including safe sun exposure strategies and nutritional support, especially for high-risk groups such as female and younger workers. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.