Back

Interstitial fluid rejuvenation through young-donor plasma exchange in cognitively impaired patients: a pilot safety and feasibility study

Soraas, A.; Engvig, A.; Alnas, D.; Karim, L. N.; Danilova, E.; Istre, M. S.; Nygaard, S.; Utgard, T. R.; Ceprnjic, S.; Reiakvam, O.; Edvardsen, E.; Westlye, L. T.; Nygaard, A. B.; Dahl, J. A.; Nissen-Meyer, L. S. H.; Ihle-Hansen, H.; Holland, P.

2026-04-30 geriatric medicine
10.64898/2026.04.29.26351809 medRxiv
Show abstract

Heterochronic parabiosis improves physiological and cognitive function in aging rodents; these benefits appear to be derived from the removal of aged blood plasma components and the addition of younger ones. In humans, removing plasma from older individuals with Alzheimers disease (AD) and replacing it with saline and albumin delayed cognitive deterioration in a large clinical trial. However, mimicking heterochronic parabiosis in humans by removing large volumes of a patients blood plasma and replacing it with plasma from young and healthy donors has not been tested. Here, we have performed a pilot study to characterize the feasibility and safety of such a procedure, replacing between 16 and 26 L of patient blood plasma with young (ages 18-24) donor blood plasma for twelve patients who recently received a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment with biomarker evidence of AD. The dose and time interval between plasma exchanges was tailored to maximize equilibration of donor plasma components into the interstitial fluid, achieving what we term interstitial rejuvenation. We explored three permutations of a plasma exchange protocol with different treatment intensities and doses, each performed on three to five patients. We present data on safety, feasibility, patient burden, resource use of the treatments, preliminary measurements of clinical variables and short-term cognitive trajectories in the patients. The procedures were safe and feasible, supporting further investigation of treatment efficacy in a larger controlled trial. This safety and feasibility study was first registered 22 December 2023 at ClinicalTrials.gov and given the identifier NCT06234436.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.6%
2
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.4%
4
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
5
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.4%
6
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
7
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
8
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
10
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
11
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.0%
13
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
15
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
17
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
19
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
26
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%