Back

Short- and Long-Term Effects of Social Isolation on Adult Murine Bone are Sex-Dependent

Martel, W. A.; King, S. B.; Buchanan, E.; Merrill, B. M.; Stohn, J. P.; Brooks, D. J.; Barlow, D.; Motyl, K. J.; Mountain, R.

2026-05-01 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.28.721448 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Social isolation is a known modifiable risk factor for many chronic diseases including cardiovascular, metabolic, and brain disorders. Recent research has demonstrated that social isolation is similarly detrimental to skeletal health, but these effects may be sexually dimorphic. In rodents, isolation negatively affects bone in adult male mice, but not in females. However, these sex differences have not been systematically investigated, and it is unknown if they persist with long-term social isolation. The goal of our study was to investigate if isolation-induced bone loss may occur on different timescales between female and male mice, as well as investigate the potential roles of estrogen and testosterone. We examined bone changes in grouped (4 mice/cage) or isolated (1 mouse/cage) female and male 16-week-old C57BL/6J mice after 2, 4, or 8 weeks of treatment. We found that social isolation through single housing significantly reduced bone parameters across treatment lengths in male mice (20% reduction in Tb.BV/TV; 8% reduction in Ct.Th.) but not in females even with prolonged isolation. Isolation also decreased biomechanical properties in the femur of male but not female mice. While the females overall bone phenotype was unaffected, isolated females did show an increase in bone turnover markers with as little as 2 weeks of isolation. Isolation also altered estrogen-related gene expression in male mice isolated for 4 or 8 weeks. Overall, our results demonstrate that short- and long-term social isolation has sexually dimorphic effects on murine bone. These findings have important clinical implications for individuals at risk for social isolation, as well as for pre-clinical rodent models utilizing single housing.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 18%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
7
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
10
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Journal of the Endocrine Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
15
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Function
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Hormones and Behavior
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
20
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%