Diet Explains Significant Variance in Oral Microbial Community Structure
Xie, Y.; Bi, M.; Gu, W.; Li, Y.; Roccuzzo, A.; Rosier, B. T.; Tonetti, M.
Show abstract
Diet is an important ecological modulator of the oral microbiome, yet population-level evidence on a broader spectrum of food components remains limited. This cross-sectional study investigated associations among dietary intake, oral rinse microbiome, and oral disease conditions in a nationally representative sample of United States adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. A total of 3,254 participants with oral rinse microbiome sequencing data were included, with oral conditions classified as oral health, caries-only, periodontitis-only, or co-existing disease. Dietary intake was assessed using 24-hour dietary recalls and summarized as dietary indices and energy-adjusted food components. Associations between diet and the oral microbiome were evaluated using community-level analyses, regression models, mediation analyses, and unsupervised clustering, while accounting for oral conditions. This study found that dietary intake, as a combined variable set, explained 3.6% of the variance in oral rinse microbial community structure; this was comparable to oral disease status or smoking and larger than sociodemographic factors. Healthier dietary profiles, including higher health-associated dietary index scores and greater vegetable and fruit intake, were associated with taxa commonly linked to oral health (e.g., Neisseria, Cardiobacterium and Lautropia). In contrast, added sugars, alcoholic drinks, cured meat, potatoes, dairy products, and higher dietary inflammatory index scores showed opposite association patterns. Mediation analyses suggested that coordinated microbial groups may partly link dietary exposures with oral disease outcomes, particularly for vegetables and added sugars. Additionally, three population-level dietary patterns were identified, among which the plant-rich pattern was associated with more favorable oral health and microbial profiles enriched in nitrate-reducing commensals, including Neisseria and Haemophilus. Overall, dietary intake was associated with oral microbiota composition and oral health conditions, supporting ecological influences of dietary components beyond sugar on oral bacteria and dental diseases. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the direction and causality of these relationships.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-way modelling of oral microbial dynamics and host-microbiome interactions during induced gingivitis 93%
- The salivary microbiome shows a high prevalence of core bacterial members yet variability across human populations 92%
- Integrative microbiome- and metatranscriptome-based analyses reveal diagnostic biomarkers for peri-implantitis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between genetically predicted circulating immune cells on periodontitis highlights the prospect of systemic immunomodulation management in periodontal care: a Mendelian randomization study 92%
- Microbiota functional activity biosensors for characterizing nutrient utilization in vivo 91%
- Parallel signatures of mammalian domestication and human industrialization in the gut microbiota 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nepali oral microbiomes reflect a gradient of lifestyles from traditional to industrialized 93%
- Defining the resilience of the human salivary microbiota by a 520 days longitudinal study in confined environment: the Mars500 mission 92%
- Microbiota responses to different prebiotics are conserved within individuals and associated with habitual fiber intake 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influential factors of saliva microbiota composition 92%
- Multiple nutritional and gut microbial factors associated with allergic rhinitis: the Hitachi Health Study 92%
- Association of Streptococcus mutans harboring bona-fide collagen binding proteins and Candida albicans with early childhood caries recurrence 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.