Decision-making in patients with ALS: experiences and implications for decision support

Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) face critical decisions regarding life-sustaining treatments, such as invasive mechanical ventilation and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Advance care planning and shared decision-making are standard supportive frameworks but they often fail to account for structural pressures like progressive decline, shifting patient values, and fear of becoming a burden that may influence decision-making. This study explores how patients with ALS interpret ventilator and care options amid progressive physical decline, thereby reconsidering approaches to decision support. Using a qualitative descriptive design, the researcher (a nurse/sociologist) conducted 2-3 hour home interviews with five purposively sampled patients with ALS. Data, including eye-tracking-aided responses, were analysed via Sandelowskis framework. Rigour was ensured through team-based triangulation, independent coding by two researchers, and a reflexive audit trail. Subjective narratives were prioritised without medical record cross-referencing to capture patients experiences. Four categories emerged: (1) Rewriting clinical prognosis into a narrative of exploration via peer models, where meeting active ventilator users transformed future perceptions; (2) The conflict between securing care infrastructure and the burden on family, which greatly influenced the will to survive; (3) Existential fluctuation, where patients intentions shifted with daily fulfilment and family events; and (4) Governance of the body via pre-emptive technology use and training carers as physical extensions. Findings showed decision-making was a multi-layered process redefining lifes meaning within social resources. This necessitate shifting from independent to relational autonomy, where agency relies on care infrastructure, not physical ability. Treatment choice is a dynamic exploration requiring narrative companions to support existential fluctuations. Professionals must coordinate environments to reduce patient indebtedness. Limitations include the small, resource-advantaged sample (N = 5) and reliance on subjective narratives without medical record verification. Living with ALS means governing a new self through relational support and continuous dialogue.