Back

A profile analysis of peripherally inserted central catheters implanted over 10 years in a quaternary hospital

da Luz, C. C.; Sorbello, C. C. J.; Epifanio, E. A.; dos Santos, C. d. A.; Brandi, S.; Guerra, J. C. d. C.; Wolosker, N.

2026-04-23 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351492 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract: Background: Vascular access is essential in treating patients undergoing prolonged endovenous therapy such as chemotherapy, antibiotics, and parenteral nutrition. Since the 1990s, when PICCs (peripherally inserted central catheters) appeared, vascular access options have expanded significantly, revolutionizing the treatment landscape for all types of patients. Objective: To analyze and describe the profile of the use of PICCs in a Brazilian quaternary hospital over 10 years with data collected by the infusion therapy team. Evaluating the number of PICCs implanted over the years, patients epidemiology and clinical characteristics, insertion details, associated complications, and the reason for removal. Methods: A retrospective cohort study that employs a quantitative, non-experimental approach to classify and statistically analyze past events associated with 21,652 PICCs implanted from January 2012 to December 2021 in a quaternary hospital at Sao Paulo - Brazil. All the catheters were implanted, and the data was collected by a team of nurses specializing in infusion therapy. We analyzed the number of catheters implanted over the years, insertion characteristics, patients epidemiology and clinical data, possible associated complications, and the reason for removal. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.4.1) and SPSS (version 29) for Windows (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Results: During the specified period, 21,652 catheters were analyzed. The patients gender distribution was nearly balanced (48.2% versus 51.8%), and the average age was 66 years. Cardiovascular and metabolic issues were the most common comorbidities, and between 2020 and 2021, 29.3% of the sample tested positive for COVID-19. The most common location of hospitalization and implantation was the medical-surgical clinic (31.6% - 41.4%), and the most used type of catheter was the Power Picc (83.9%). The estimated complication incidence density is 2.94 complications per 1,000 catheter-days. Almost all the PICCs (98,2%) were adequately located at the cavo-atrial junction after the first attempt, 82.2% of catheters were removed after therapy, and the median duration of catheter use was 12 days. Conclusion: PICCs are widely employed for drug infusion, with their use growing progressively due to specialized teams greater availability and training. The high efficiency of these devices with a relatively low risk of complications already observed in previous studies was reinforced by the findings of this study of more than 20,000 catheters.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
38.5%
2
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
3
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
7
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
20
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
21
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
22
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%