Back

Factors influencing repeated decisions to decline cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in Jos, Nigeria: a qualitative study

Abubakar, A.; Inuwa, S. M.; Ali, M. J.; Abdullahi, K. M.; Doe, A.; Ngaybe, M. G. B.; Madhivanan, P.; Musa, J.

2026-04-23 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.22.26351475 medRxiv
Show abstract

Women living with HIV face about a six-fold higher risk of cervical cancer, yet screening uptake remains low in many sub-Saharan African settings. We explored factors influencing repeated decisions to decline cervical cancer screening during routine HIV care among women living with HIV at a large HIV clinic in Jos, Nigeria. Between September and December 2024, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study at the AIDS Prevention Initiative in Nigeria Clinic in Jos, Nigeria. We purposively recruited 27 women living with HIV aged 21 to 65 years who had never undergone cervical cancer screening and had repeatedly declined screening offers during routine HIV care, including at the current clinic visit. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted in English or Hausa, audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and translated into English where needed. Data were analyzed thematically using theory-informed coding based on the Health Belief Model and Social Ecological Model. Among 27 women living with HIV who had repeatedly declined screening, perceived susceptibility was often low or uncertain despite recognition of cervical cancer severity. Perceived benefits were acknowledged but were frequently outweighed by overlapping barriers, including knowledge gaps and misinformation, indirect and downstream costs, emotional barriers, logistical constraints, clinic-flow and service-delivery barriers, and anticipated stigma. Education, reminders, and supportive clinic processes acted as cues to action, and most participants expressed willingness to screen in future. Among women living with HIV at this clinic who repeatedly declined screening when it was offered, perceived benefits were often outweighed by multilevel barriers. Screening programs may integrate fear-reduction and stigma-sensitive counseling with practical service delivery improvements, including shorter waiting times, reduced indirect costs, predictable and streamlined clinic flow, and consistent provider invitations and reminders, while addressing misinformation through community-embedded, culturally tailored messaging. These strategies may improve screening uptake and support more equitable cervical cancer prevention for women living with HIV in similar HIV-care settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
38.5%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.7%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
5
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.1%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
8
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
15
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Virology Journal
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
23
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%