Back

Diastolic Age: A Cardiac Biological Clock Derived from Echocardiography and the PREVENT Heart Failure Risk Score

Fahed, G.; Cauwenberghs, N.; Santana, E. J.; Chen, R.; Celestin, B. E.; Gomes Botelho Quintas, B. F.; Short, S.; Carroll, M.; Miyoshi, T.; Alexander, K. M.; Shah, S. H.; Orr, S. S.; Kovacs, A.; Daubert, M. A.; Kuznetsova, T.; Addetia, K.; Asch, F. M.; Mahaffey, K. W.; Douglas, P. S.; Haddad, F.

2026-04-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350995 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Among cardiac measures, diastolic parameters demonstrate the earliest and most consistent age-related changes. This can be leveraged to develop a continuous left ventricular (LV) Diastolic Age from routine echocardiographic parameters. Analogous to how epigenetic clocks weight molecular markers against mortality risk, we calibrated Diastolic Age by weighting echocardiographic features against the validated PREVENT-Heart Failure (HF) risk score. Methods: We analyzed 1,952 participants from the Project Baseline Health Study (median age 50 [36-64] years, 54% female). The measure was derived using partial least-squares regression anchored on PREVENT-HF and calibrated within a healthy reference subgroup. External validation was performed in the WASE (n=1,708) and Stanford Cardiovascular Aging (n=313) cohorts. Associations with ASE-defined LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), epigenetic clocks, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were examined. Results: Diastolic Age correlated strongly with chronological age (r=0.78) with robust external validation (WASE r=0.76; Stanford r=0.82; calibration slopes {approx}1.0). It increased progressively across grades of diastolic dysfunction and discriminated LVDD with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.92), and was independently associated with hypertension, diabetes, and elevated C-reactive protein. While correlated with the Levine (r=0.76) and Horvath (r=0.41) epigenetic clocks, residual analyses indicated that Diastolic Age captures a distinct cardiac-specific dimension of biological aging. Over median follow-up of 4.2 years, it independently predicted MACE (HR 2.30, 95% CI 1.70-3.18), with accelerated diastolic aging across all age groups among those with events. Discrimination was comparable to ASE-defined LVDD (C-index 0.83 vs. 0.82). Conclusion: Diastolic Age provides a continuous, echocardiography-derived measure of cardiac biological aging that complements categorical diastolic grading and epigenetic aging clocks, and independently predicts cardiovascular outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.5%
8
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
11
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
18
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
28
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%