Back

Motor-tasks fMRI BOLD activations in chronic stroke with residual hemiparesis in the upper extremity: a pre-neurofeedback baseline characterization

Varisco, G.; Plantin, J.; Almeida, R.; Palmcrantz, S.; Astrand, E.

2026-04-17 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.04.15.26350962 medRxiv
Show abstract

Stroke is the third leading cause of death and disability combined worldwide and often results in hemiparesis. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a non-invasive technique used to investigate changes in brain activations during tasks aimed at restoring the lost motor function. Participants with chronic stroke and residual hemiparesis in the upper extremity were recruited for a clinical intervention that included neurofeedback training and fMRI sessions with motor-execution and motor-imagery tasks. The present study provides a baseline characterization of brain activations prior to neurofeedback training. Since lesion site and volume varied across participants, two fMRI preprocessing pipelines were applied. The first one was used for twelve participants with lesions restricted to a single hemisphere and for one participant with small secondary lesions in the contralesional hemisphere, whereas the second one was used for two participants with large bilateral lesions. These were followed by quality control measures and statistical analysis. First-level (i.e., single-participant) analysis returned the strongest and most extensive activation across participants during motor-execution tasks, with clusters identified in the ipsilesional parietal lobe, bilateral occipital lobes, and cerebellum after Family-Wise Error correction. Second-level (i.e., group-level) analysis involving participants who underwent the first fMRI preprocessing pipeline revealed a significant cluster in the cerebellum after False Discovery Rate correction. These results are consistent with previous studies involving participants with chronic stroke performing motor-tasks. Cerebellar recruitment observed consistently across participants could reflect compensatory mechanisms supporting motor control after stroke.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.6%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.6%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
6
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
8
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
14
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%