On the road to early detection: A survey study of barriers and facilitators to community participation in a mobile lung cancer screening program
Cottrell-Daniels, C.; Sadig, N.; Haddan, S.; Roman, S.; Simmons, V. N.; Schabath, M. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundWhile a mobile lung cancer screening (mLCS) program can mitigate barriers to access, this study conducted a survey study to assess barriers and facilitators to mLCS which could inform the implementation of new mLCS programs or inform modifications to existing programs. MethodsPatient eligibility included current age of 50 to 80 and had undergone any cancer screening at Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) between January 1, 2023 and December 1, 2024. A web-based survey was administered from May 2025 to June 2025 which collected data on health behaviors, barriers, facilitators, screening preferences, and demographics. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify survey responses. ResultsAmong participants who completed the survey, 73.4% reported no concerns about getting screened in a mobile screening unit, 67.9% reported concerned about the cost or if insurance covered mobile lung cancer screening, and 82.4% reported they would be screened if a voucher or insurance would pay for it. For preferences, 54.1% reported no preference for the time of year for a mobile screening event, 59.6% reported they will be willing to wait up to 30 minutes to get screened, and 44% would travel more than 20 minutes to get screened. There were no statistically significant differences in barriers and facilitators when the analyses were stratified by LCS eligibility. ConclusionsWe found acceptability of mobile lung cancer screening and preferences that are actionable including daytime weekday events, indoor waiting, short waits, proximity to home, clear cost coverage, and streamlined clinician recommendation.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Successful Participant Engagement in a Public Health Research Study: a Focus on a Latino Community 95%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 94%
- Cost savings in male circumcision post-operative care continuum in rural and urban South Africa: Evidence on the importance of initial counselling and daily SMS 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 94%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 92%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 93%
- Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework 93%
- Comparing in-person, blended and virtual training interventions; a real-world evaluation of HIV capacity building programs in 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of Telemedicine vs. In-Person Ambulatory Care Visits on Cancellation Rates and 30-Day Follow-Up Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits 92%
- Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination status among staff and faculty of a large, diverse University in Los Angeles 91%
- Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among residents of Northern California jails 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening practices among clinicians practicing in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A mixed methods study 95%
- Understanding disruptions in cancer care to reduce increased cancer burden 95%
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening and Treatment in Older Adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.