Back

Strain- and age-dependent divergence in mouse appetitive spatial learning and decision strategies

Liu, J.; Manahan-Vaughan, D.; Haubrich, J.

2026-04-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.13.718350 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animals rely on associative spatial memory to navigate toward previously learned, reward-associated goals. This reward-guided navigation is supported by the hippocampus and its interactions with cortical and subcortical regions: processes which are vital for integrating sensory cues and forming experience-dependent associations. In adulthood, hippocampal-dependent information processing is shaped by aging, reflecting changes in synaptic plasticity and neuromodulatory support. In parallel, mice with distinct genetic backgrounds show systematic differences in behavior, sensory function, and hippocampal plasticity. How mouse strain and age interact to affect spatial appetitive memories has not been well defined. Here, we trained CBA/CaOlaHsd and C57BL/6 mice in early (2-3 months) or late adulthood (7-8 months), in daily training events, to perform a T-maze task with rewards available at a fixed location and decreasing probability in one maze arm. The task consisted of an initial deterministic phase in which a correct response was always rewarded, followed by a probabilistic phase during which reward omissions became increasingly prevalent. We measured correct choices, as well as latencies across training blocks, and combined trial-by-trial metrics with reinforcement learning modeling to assess decision strategies. We observed that CBA/CaOlaHsd mice displayed lower choice latencies than C57BL/6 mice, reached high performance earlier, and maintained better performance when the reward probability decreased. Age was associated with higher latencies and modulated both performance and decision policies in a strain-dependent manner. Moreover, CBA/CaOlaHsd mice displayed higher learning rates from positive outcomes and adopted strategies consistent with more robust context exploitation under uncertainty. C57BL/6 mice, by contrast, exhibited stronger omission-driven strategy switching. Together, these findings reveal robust strain- and age-dependent differences in trial-by-trial decision policies and spatial learning performance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.2%
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
14
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
18
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
21
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
26
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%