Back

A clinicoradiological model for preoperative prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer

Shen, Q.; Wang, G.; Fu, M.; Yao, K.; Yang, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Guo, Y.

2026-04-15 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.04.13.26350816 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with rectal cancer and may influence the indication for lateral lymph node dissection. Accurate preoperative identification of LLNM remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinicoradiological model for preoperative prediction of LLNM in rectal cancer. Methods A retrospective cohort of 64 patients undergoing lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for rectal cancer was analysed; 21 (32.8%) had pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). A prespecified preoperative clinicoradiological model was fitted using penalised logistic regression with L2 regularisation (ridge), incorporating MRI-measured lateral lymph node short-axis diameter (LLN-SAD), dichotomised clinical T stage (T3-4 vs T1-2), dichotomised clinical N stage (N+ vs N0), and log(CA19-9+1). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and bootstrap internal validation. Results The model showed good discrimination (AUC 0.914), with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.887 on bootstrap validation. Calibration remained acceptable after optimism correction (calibration intercept -0.127; slope 1.045). Decision curve analysis suggested net benefit across clinically relevant threshold probabilities, particularly between 0.10 and 0.30. The model was implemented as a web-based calculator to facilitate clinical use. Conclusion This clinicoradiological model showed good discrimination, acceptable calibration, and potential clinical utility for preoperative assessment of LLNM risk in rectal cancer. It may assist individualized risk stratification and treatment planning, although external validation is required before routine clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
19.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
3
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
26
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%