Back

Intersectoral collaboration and community voice in a marginalized neighbourhood: A longitudinal social network analysis

van Lammeren, R.; Schalk, J.; van der Pas, S.; Bussemaker, J.

2026-04-11 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.10.26350579 medRxiv
Show abstract

In this article we argue that intersectoral collaboration is ultimately manifested at the neighbourhood level, where professionals from diverse sectors engage in a joint network to improve population health outcomes. To strengthen intersectoral collaboration in neighbourhoods with low SES, it is crucial to include the community voice, representing diverse citizens who must be heard and engaged in decision-making processes. This study aims to contribute to the literature of intersectoral collaboration by exploring how networks emerge and evolve over time. We focus on the development of the roles of citizens in the professional network and diverse sectoral involvement within a local network of the team called The Connectors, in a neighbourhood with low socioeconomic scores (SESs). Methodologically, we use a combination of social network analysis (SNA) and action research. Results show that the network expanded significantly over time, both in terms of the number of actors and the diversity of sectors involved. At both measurement points T1 and T2, the majority of collaborations occurred across sectoral boundaries. By the second measurement, the proportion of intersectoral relationships had increased. This indicates that as the network expanded, new collaborations were not confined to existing sectoral clusters but increasingly bridged different sectors. The dual role that citizens have taken on during the development of the network, serving both as community voice representatives and professionals, can be empowering, offering pathways for personal growth and career advancement. However, it also introduces complexity, as these individuals may experience tensions between personal commitments and professional responsibilities. To enable network development, policies should allow room beyond standard protocols and organizational silos, as well as provide sufficient time for relationships and structures to mature. Although network building is a gradual and complex process, once established, these networks can play a pivotal role in delivering integrated and responsive care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.3%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.8%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.4%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
10
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
12
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
15
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%