Back

Predictors of intention to use mobile health apps for comprehensive sexuality education among young people in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a correlational study

Maneraguha, F. K.; Cote, J.; Bourbonnais, A.; Arbour, C.; Chagnon, M.; Hatem, M.

2026-04-13 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350561 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Comprehensive sexuality education (CSE) is essential to the health and well-being of young people. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where more than 65% of the population is under the age of 25, access to interpersonal CSE remains limited owing to sociocultural and structural barriers. This exposes young people to persistent socio-sanitary vulnerabilities. In this context, mobile health apps (MHAs) constitute a promising solution, supported by the growing use of smartphones among young Congolese. However, this group's intention to use MHAs for CSE has been the subject of little research to date. Objective The aim of this study was to identify predictors of intention to use MHAs among young Congolese, based on the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2). Methods A predictive correlational study was conducted in eight public secondary schools in Bukavu (DRC) with a stratified random sample of 859 students. Predictors of intention to use--performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), social influence (SI), facilitating conditions (FC), and perceived risk (PR)--and moderators--age, gender, and past MHA experience--were measured from data collected through a self-administered UTAUT questionnaire. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were run on SPSS version 28. Results Mean age of participants was 16.3 years (SD = 1.5). Boys made up 55.1% of the sample. Overall, 51.0% of the sample owned a smartphone, of which 62.3% reported having easy access to mobile data and 16.2% were already using MHAs to learn about sexual health. Intention to use MHAs was positively influenced by PE ({beta} = 0.523, p < 0.001), EE ({beta} = 0.115, p < 0.001), and SI ({beta} = 0.113, p < 0.001). FC (p = 0.260) and PR (p = 0.631), however, had no significant influence. Age moderated all of the relationships tested (F (1, 849-854) = 9.97-20.82; p [&le;] 0.002), with more marked effects observed among younger participants 14-15 years old. The final model explained 44% of the variance, indicating good predictive power. Conclusion Intention to use digital CSE was explained primarily by PE, EE, and SI and moderated by age. To strengthen this intention, stakeholders will need to promote e-interventions that are pertinent, easy to use, socially valorized, and tailored to young people's needs and to the local context.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.2%
2
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
15
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
17
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%