Back

Ultra-processed food consumption and frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pu, M.; Ma, Q.

2026-03-30 nutrition
10.64898/2026.03.29.26349639 medRxiv
Show abstract

Frailty is an age-related syndrome characterized by biological dysfunction and reduced physiological reserve in response to stressors. Its prevalence is increasing with population aging, resulting in a substantial health burden due to adverse outcomes on health, such as cardiovascular disease and mortality. Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), defined as industrial formulations made primarily from processed ingredients, have received increasing attention due to their potential role in the development and progression of frailty. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between ultra-processed food intake and the risk of frailty in older adults. This study systematically searched for all relevant studies published up to January 2026. Ten observational studies involving 105327 participants, comprising 6 prospective and 4 cross-sectional studies, were included in the systematic review, of which 6 were eligible for meta-analysis. Random-effects models were employed to estimate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Meta-analysis showed that higher consumption of UPFs was significantly associated with an increased risk of frailty (pooled OR = 1.43, 95% CI = [1.02-2.005], p = 0.041). Narrative synthesis further supported a positive association between UPF intake and frailty or related outcomes. Our findings suggest that a higher consumption of ultra-processed foods may contribute to frailty risk, potentially through inflammatory pathways. However, given the high heterogeneity, results should be interpreted with caution. Overall, our findings suggest that reducing UPF consumption may be a promising target for public health strategies to prevent frailty in ageing populations.

Published in Health Psychology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.